There is a metaphorical term used in China referring to a situation in the job market where companies or organizations create specific positions tailored for particular individuals, which means the person in charge of recruitment already has thea target candidate for that position, but to meet the company's compliance rules, they have to go through the recruitment process anyway.

During our phone communicnversation, it seemed quite a match for my experience, but after I read the JD she sent to me afterward., I realized it might be a radish pit.

The headhunter looks like an experienced one. / seems experienced.

She {might know | probably knows} this kind of situation as well.

However, she had to perform the roles requested by her clients.

AThe Radish Pit

We use “The” here to introduce a specific concept. Since "Radish Pit" is being defined and discussed as a unique term, the definite article sounds more appropriate.

TIn China, there i's a metaphorical term used in Chinathat referrings to a situation in the job market situation where companies or organizations create specific positionscreate positions specifically tailored for particularcertain individuals, which. This means the person in charge of recruitmenthiring manager already has the targeta candidate for that position, but to meet the company'sin mind, but due to compliance rules, they still have to go through the formal recruitment process anyway.

The original sentence was long and a bit difficult to follow, so it was split into two shorter ones. “Referring to a situation” was changed to “that refers to” for clarity, and “person in charge of recruitment” was replaced with “hiring manager,” which is a more natural and common term in American English. The rest was slightly reworded to improve flow and readability.

It'This term is called 萝卜坑, a direct translation would be: which literally translates to "radish pit."

“Which literally translates to” sounds more fluent than “a direct translation would be,” and this small change helps the sentence sound more natural overall.

Last night, a headhunter approached me and recommended a position inat an international company.

“Position at” is the more natural preposition to use with companies.

During phone communication, it seemed quite aOver the phone, it sounded like a good match for my experience, but after I reading the JD she sent to me afterwardjob description she sent me, I realized it might be a radish pit.

“During phone communication” was rephrased as “over the phone,” which is the standard, idiomatic way to say that. Also, the phrase “after I read the JD she sent to me afterward” was grammatically incorrect and a bit redundant, so it was revised to a smoother and clearer version.

There are so many details on the JD's job description includes so many specific requirements and qualifications that you can imagine a specific person behind those wordsalmost picture the person it's written for.

This version sounds more natural and uses more direct language. Instead of “details on the JD’s requirements,” we say “includes so many specific requirements,” which avoids unnecessary repetition. “Imagine a specific person behind those words” was changed to “almost picture the person it's written for” to make the imagery more vivid and fluid.

The headhunter looks like anseemed experienced one.

“Looks like an experienced one” isn’t something native speakers would typically say, so it was changed to “seemed experienced.”

She might know this kind of situation as wellprobably recognized the situation too, but she still had to fulfill her client’s requests.

This was slightly smoothed out to sound more natural, and “perform the roles requested” was revised to “fulfill her client’s requests,” which is more appropriate in business English.

It'’s quite an interesting situation.

Adding the word “situation” makes the sentence feel more complete and ties it back to the context of the radish pit.

Twenty years ago, this kind of radish pit situation normally happens typically occurred in local businesses, and bwere rarely in international companies.

“Normally happened” was changed to “typically occurred” for smoother, more natural phrasing. “Barely” was replaced with “were rare,” which is more accurate in this context.

But nowadays, things have been, the trend has reversed.

“Things have been reversed” became “the trend has reversed” for clarity and precision.

If you want higherto improve efficiency, you should avoid situations like the "'radish pit" situation.'

“Higher efficiency” was reworded to “improve efficiency,” which is more idiomatic. Also, generalizing the sentence with “situations like the ‘radish pit’” sounds more natural and leaves room for other similar cases.

During phone communication, it seemed quite a match for my experience, but after I read the JD she sent to me afterward.

u can use phone call instead of phone communication, also u don't need to use afterward if you have already used after once