Dec. 13, 2024
Recently, China seems to be a model of infrastructure. Many foreign friends chatted with me about this topic. But most of them believe it's because of the highly developed technology.
I think it's more than that.
Many years ago, I visited the Dujiangyan, an irrigation system built during the Warring States Time about 2300 years ago. It has been maintained by generations of Chinese and still works today.
If you had seen it, you would have been as surprised as me.
I used to not understand why ancient Chinese people built their houses with wood, which was so easily destroyed compared to the stone buildings in other cultures.
After seeing the amount of big stones in Dujiangyan, I kind of got our ancestors' logic: flood control and irrigation are more important than building bigger houses.
I encountered a lot of this while hiking in the wild mountains of China. For example, a trail out of a mountain still can be used while the village that built it has disappeared because the trail was paved with stones while the houses in the village might be built with wood and mud.
A lLittle Discovery on Hiking
Many foreign friends chatted with me about this topic.
But most of them believe it's because of the highly developed technology.
I think it's more than that.
Many years ago, I visited the Dujiangyan, an irrigation system built during the Warring States Time about 2300 years ago.
It has been maintained by generations of Chinesesince it's construction and it still works today.
If you had seen it, you would have been as surprised as me.
I used to noPreviously, I didn't understand why ancient Chinese people built their houses with wood, which was so easily destroyed compared to the stone buildings in other cultures.
I encountered a lot of this while hiking in the wild mountains of China.
For example, a trail out of a mountain still can be used while the village that built it has disappeared because the trail was paved with stones while the houses in the village might be built with wood and mud.
Feedback
As I was reading it I was surprised. There are so many amazing things in this world.
Also, I think China has a very good maintenance culture.
A lLittle Discovery on Hiking
Many years ago, I visited the Dujiangyan, an irrigation system built during the Warring States Time about 2,300 years ago.
You can say "I visited Dunjiangyan" (omit the 'the') or "I visited the Dunjiangyan Irrigation System" to sound more natural.
If you had seen it, you would have been as surprised as meI was.
Your meaning is very clear! Use "I was" instead of "me" to improve your grammar. To sound even more natural, you can say: "If you had seen it, you would have been just as surprised as I was."
I used to not understand why ancient Chinese people built their houses with wood, which was so easily destroyed compared to the stone buildings in other cultures.
After seeing the large amount of big stones in Dujiangyan, I kind of got our ancestors' logic: flood control and irrigation are more important than building bigger houses.
This sentence is correct! To be more specific, say "large amount of big stones" so the reader clearly knows there are a lot of big stones in Dujiangyan (not a little).
For example, a trail leading out of a mountain still can be used whileeven if the village that built it has disappeared, because the trail was paved with stones, while the houses in the village might bewere likely built with wood and mud.
Use "leading out of the a mountain" to sound more natural and be more specific! Use "even if" instead of "while" to clearly express that, despite the village that built the trail is gone, the trial is still in operation because it was paved with stones. Use "were likely" instead of "might be" to sound more natural!
Feedback
This entry is very well-written! I looked up Dunjiangyan, and it's a very fascinating city. Also, your English is amazing! The prose in this story is very engaging and sounds very natural.
Thank you for writing! Good work :)
A little Discovery on Hiking A A |
Recently, China seems to be a model of infrastructure. |
Many foreign friends chatted with me about this topic. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
But most of them believe it's because of the highly developed technology. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
I think it's more than that. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
Many years ago, I visited the Dujiangyan, an irrigation system built during the Warring States Time about 2300 years ago. Many years ago, I visited You can say "I visited Dunjiangyan" (omit the 'the') or "I visited the Dunjiangyan Irrigation System" to sound more natural. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
It has been maintained by generations of Chinese and still works today. It has been maintained |
If you had seen it, you would have been as surprised as me. If you had seen it, you would have been as surprised as Your meaning is very clear! Use "I was" instead of "me" to improve your grammar. To sound even more natural, you can say: "If you had seen it, you would have been just as surprised as I was." This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
I encountered a lot of this while hiking in the wild mountains of China. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
For example, a trail out of a mountain still can be used while the village that built it has disappeared because the trail was paved with stones while the houses in the village might be built with wood and mud. For example, a trail leading out of a mountain still can be used Use "leading out of the a mountain" to sound more natural and be more specific! Use "even if" instead of "while" to clearly express that, despite the village that built the trail is gone, the trial is still in operation because it was paved with stones. Use "were likely" instead of "might be" to sound more natural! This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
I used to not understand why ancient Chinese people built their houses with wood, which was so easily destroyed compared to the stone buildings in other cultures. I used to not understand why ancient Chinese people built their houses with wood, which was so easily destroyed compared to the stone buildings in other cultures.
|
After seeing the amount of big stones in Dujiangyan, I kind of got our ancestors' logic: flood control and irrigation are more important than building bigger houses. After seeing the large amount of big stones in Dujiangyan, I kind of got our ancestors' logic: flood control and irrigation are more important than building bigger houses. This sentence is correct! To be more specific, say "large amount of big stones" so the reader clearly knows there are a lot of big stones in Dujiangyan (not a little). |
You need LangCorrect Premium to access this feature.
Go Premium