slycrow's avatar
slycrow

Aug. 26, 2020

0
The danger of the right extrisim in germany

A few days ago Björn Höcke, head of the AfD in Thuringia was interviewed by the MDR, a german tv channel. In there so called "summer interviews" the MDR interviews each party-chef of all relevant parties in the state of Thuringia. But this interview was different. It wasn't even sure if it happened. The AfD scored around 25% in the last election in Thuringia. So why wouldn't Björn Höcke be invited? The case for Höcke is special. Very special. Höcke is known to be a right extremist. Höcke is known for his qoutes about the jewish memorial calling it a "memorial of shame". Some of his party members couldn't distinguish qoutes from his one book with qoutes from Hitlers "Mein Kampf". Höcke also once canceled an interview because he didn't like the reporter asking him out about the language he uses. You're officially allowed to call him a Fascist.

So why was he invited? Why would a serious tv channel invite a right extremist for an interview?

Those questions are good, yet simple; because he represents a lot of voters. But where do those voters come from? If we look at the results of past elections in each state, we can see a clear pattern. They win in the east, but loose in the west. But why is that so?

In order to understand the problems of people living in eastern germany, we need to take a look into our history book. After World War 2, germany was divided into two states;
East Germany, a communistic dictatorship and
West Germany, a democratic capitalistic country

After the reunification of germany in 1990, there were a lot of problems in the Eastern part. There's a lot to be said about this topic, but since im not that famillar with period and this text is just a practise for me, i'm just gonna tell you this;
The people of eastern germany were and still are unsatisified with their treatment after the Reunification. That led them to anger. This anger was dissolved during the refugee crisis in 2015. The AfD used this anger in order to gain votes. And now we here, 7 years after their foundation, the AfD threatens to become the second biggest party in all germany(even though they lost votes according to polls during the Corona-Crisis).


So should we give them their space in tv and media? My answer to that is a clear "no". Medias can influence people in different shapes. If we let guys such as Höcke influence the younger generation, we're guilty for all their doing, once in power. In other words; if we let anti-democrats their space, we don't protect our democracy and therefore our democracy is vulnerable. Democracy is of course also that you can vote who or what you want, but it's also that we ban those, who want to destroy our beloved republic. Moliere once said; "It is not only what we do, but also what we do not do, for which we are accountable" and i find that very fitting


Little sidenote; I don't want a political discussion here. There are other spaces for that. Thanks for reading.

Corrections (3)
Correction Settings
Choose how corrections are organized

Only show inserted text
Word-level diffs are planned for a future update.

But this interview was different.

So why wouldn't Björn Höcke be invited?

The case for Höcke is special.

So why was he invited?

But where do those voters come from?

If we look at the results of past elections in each state, we can see a clear pattern.

But why is that so?

That led them to anger.

The AfD used this anger in order to gain votes.

There are other spaces for that.

Thanks for reading.

But this interview was different.

The AfD scored around 25% in the last election in Thuringia.

So why wouldn't Björn Höcke be invited?

The case for Höcke is special.

Very special.

So why was he invited?

But where do those voters come from?

If we look at the results of past elections in each state, we can see a clear pattern.

But why is that so?

That led them to anger.

My answer to that is a clear "no".

There are other spaces for that.

Thanks for reading.

But this interview was different.

The AfD scored around 25% in the last election in Thuringia.

So why wouldn't Björn Höcke be invited?

The case for Höcke is special.

Very special.

Höcke is known for his qoutes about the jewish memorial calling it a "memorial of shame".

So why was he invited?

But where do those voters come from?

If we look at the results of past elections in each state, we can see a clear pattern.

But why is that so?

That led them to anger.

This anger was dissolved during the refugee crisis in 2015.

The AfD used this anger in order to gain votes.

So should we give them their space in tv and media?

My answer to that is a clear "no".

There are other spaces for that.

Thanks for reading.

But where do those voters come from?


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

Those questions are good, yet simple; because he represents a lot of voters.


Those questions are good, yete answer is simple; --because he represents a lot of voters. The answer is simple--because he represents a lot of voters.

also correct: These are good questions, yet it is simple--because he represents a lot of voters.

Those questions are good, yet simple;easy to answer: because he represents a lot of voters. Those questions are good, yet easy to answer: because he represents a lot of voters.

Those questions are good, yetbut the answer is simple;: because he represents a lot of voters. Those questions are good, but the answer is simple: because he represents a lot of voters.

The danger of the right extrisim in germany


The dDanger of the rRight -extremisim in gGermany The Danger of Right-extremism in Germany

Nouns are capitalized if it is a title. You probably knew this, I'm just being strict :)

The danger of the right-wing extremisim in gGermany The danger of right-wing extremism in Germany

The dDanger of the right eRightwing Extremisim in gGermany The Danger of Rightwing Extremism in Germany

A few days ago Björn Höcke, head of the AfD in Thuringia was interviewed by the MDR, a german tv channel.


A few days ago, Björn Höcke, head of the AfD in Thuringia, was interviewed by the MDR, a gGerman tv channel. A few days ago, Björn Höcke, head of the AfD in Thuringia, was interviewed by the MDR, a German tv channel.

A few days ago, Björn Höcke, head of the AfD in Thuringia was interviewed by the MDR, a german tv channel. A few days ago, Björn Höcke, head of the AfD in Thuringia was interviewed by the MDR, a german tv channel.

A few days ago, Björn Höcke, head of the AfD in Thuringia was interviewed by the MDR, a gGerman tvTV channel. A few days ago, Björn Höcke, head of the AfD in Thuringia was interviewed by the MDR, a German TV channel.

In there so called "summer interviews" the MDR interviews each party-chef of all relevant parties in the state of Thuringia.


In theire so -called "summer interviews", the MDR interviews each party-chefleader of all relevant parties in the state of Thuringia. In their so-called "summer interviews", the MDR interviews each party-leader of all relevant parties in the state of Thuringia.

In theire so called "summer interviews", the MDR interviews each party-chef of all relevant parties in the state of Thuringia. In their so called "summer interviews", the MDR interviews each party-chef of all relevant parties in the state of Thuringia.

In theire so -called "summer interviews," the MDR interviews each party-chefad of all relevant parties in the state of Thuringia. In their so-called "summer interviews," the MDR interviews each party-head of all relevant parties in the state of Thuringia.

But this interview was different.


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

It wasn't even sure if it happened.


It wasn't even sure if itThis is correct. This is better: It may have not even happened. This is correct. This is better: It may have not even happened.

This is correct. This is better: It may have not even happened.

It wasn't even sure if itmay not have even happened. It may not have even happened.

I'm not completely sure if this keeps the original meaning, but this makes more sense to me. On its own, "It may not have even happened" is still not ideal, because it sounds like the interview may have been fabricated though.

It wasn't even sure ifwhy it happened. I wasn't even sure why it happened.

The AfD scored around 25% in the last election in Thuringia.


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

The AfD scorearned around 25% of the vote in the last election in Thuringia. The AfD earned around 25% of the vote in the last election in Thuringia.

So why wouldn't Björn Höcke be invited?


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

The case for Höcke is special.


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

Very special.


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

Höcke is known to be a right extremist.


Höcke is known to be a right -extremist. Höcke is known to be a right-extremist.

Höcke is known to be a right-wing extremist. Höcke is known to be a right-wing extremist.

Höcke is known to be a rightwing extremist. Höcke is known to be a rightwing extremist.

Höcke is known for his qoutes about the jewish memorial calling it a "memorial of shame".


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

Höcke is known for his qouotes about the jJewish memorial, calling it a "memorial of shame". Höcke is known for his quotes about the Jewish memorial, calling it a "memorial of shame".

Höcke is known for his qouotes about the jewishHolocaust memorial calling it a "memorial of shame"." Höcke is known for his quotes about the Holocaust memorial calling it a "memorial of shame."

Religions and adjectives derived from them should always be capitalized, so it should be "Jewish memorial." I changed it to "Holocaust memorial" because I think that is more widely used.

Some of his party members couldn't distinguish qoutes from his one book with qoutes from Hitlers "Mein Kampf".


Some of his party members couldn't distinguish qouotes from his one book with qouotes from Hitler's "Mein Kampf". Some of his party members couldn't distinguish quotes from his book with quotes from Hitler's "Mein Kampf".

Some of his party members couldn't distinguish qouotes from his one book with qoufrom quotes from Hitler's "Mein Kampf". Some of his party members couldn't distinguish quotes from his one book from quotes from Hitler's "Mein Kampf".

Some of his party members couldn't distinguish qouotes from his onebook (or: quotes from one of his books) with qouotes from Hitler's "<i>Mein Kampf"</i>. Some of his party members couldn't distinguish quotes from his book (or: quotes from one of his books) with quotes from Hitler's <i>Mein Kampf</i>.

I'm not sure if HTML works on this website, but titles of books are generally italicized, not put in quotes.

Höcke also once canceled an interview because he didn't like the reporter asking him out about the language he uses.


Höcke also once canceled an interview because he didn't like the reporter asking him out about the language he uses. Höcke also once canceled an interview because he didn't like the reporter asking him about the language he uses.

"canceled" is common in american-english "cancelled" is common in british-english both are correct

Höcke also once canceled an interview because he didn't like the reporter asking him out about the language he uses. Höcke also once canceled an interview because he didn't like the reporter asking him about the language he uses.

Höcke also once canceledwalked out of an interview because he didn't like the reporter asking him about about the language he uses. Höcke also once walked out of an interview because he didn't like the reporter asking him about about the language he uses.

"Walked out of an interview" is an idiomatic way to describe leaving an interview while it's happening

You're officially allowed to call him a Fascist.


You're officially allowed to call him a Ffascist. You're officially allowed to call him a fascist.

You're officially allowed to call him a Ffascist. You're officially allowed to call him a fascist.

You're officially allowed to can definitely call him a Ffascist. You can definitely call him a fascist.

"Officially allowed" sounds a bit odd in this context. I only capitalize "fascist" if it's referring to the Fascist Party of Italy in the 1920/40s; otherwise, the lowercase is fine. (But this usage isn't universal)

So why was he invited?


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

Why would a serious tv channel invite a right extremist for an interview?


Why would a serious tv channel invite a right -extremist for an interview? Why would a serious tv channel invite a right-extremist for an interview?

Why would a serious tvTV channel invite a right-wing extremist for an interview? Why would a serious TV channel invite a right-wing extremist for an interview?

Why would a serious tvTV channel invite a rightwing extremist for an interview? Why would a serious TV channel invite a rightwing extremist for an interview?

If we look at the results of past elections in each state, we can see a clear pattern.


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

They win in the east, but loose in the west.


They win in the eEast, but loose in the wWest. They win in the East, but lose in the West.

Directions are capitalized if you have "the" before it.

They win in the eEast, but loose in the wWest. They win in the East, but lose in the West.

I would replace "they" with "the AfD" for clarity.

They win in the eEast, but loose in the wWest. They win in the East but lose in the West.

But why is that so?


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

In order to understand the problems of people living in eastern germany, we need to take a look into our history book.


In order to understand the problems of people living in eastern gGermany, we need to take a look into our history book. In order to understand the problems of people living in eastern Germany, we need to take a look into our history book.

In order to understand the problems of people living in eEastern gGermany, we need to take a look into our history book. In order to understand the problems of people living in Eastern Germany, we need to take a look into our history book.

In order to understand the problems of people living in eastern gGermany, we need to take a look into our history book. In order to understand the problems of people living in eastern Germany, we need to take a look into our history book.

After World War 2, germany was divided into two states;


After World War 2II, gGermany was divided into two states; After World War II, Germany was divided into two states;

We use the roman numerals "II" and "I" instead of "2" and "1" for the world wars. WW2 is also correct.

After World War 2, gGermany was divided into two states;: After World War 2, Germany was divided into two states:

After World War 2, gGermany was divided into two states;: After World War 2, Germany was divided into two states:

East Germany, a communistic dictatorship and


East Germany, a communistic dictatorship, and East Germany, a communistic dictatorship, and

East Germany, a communistic dictatorship and East Germany, a communist dictatorship and

East Germany, a cCommunistic dictatorship and East Germany, a Communist dictatorship and

West Germany, a democratic capitalistic country


West Germany, a democratic capitalistic country. West Germany, a democratic capitalistic country.

West Germany, a democratic capitalistic country. West Germany, a democratic capitalistic country.

West Germany, a democratic, capitalistic country. West Germany, a democratic, capitalistic country.

After the reunification of germany in 1990, there were a lot of problems in the Eastern part.


After the reunification of gGermany in 1990, there were a lot of problems in the Eastern part. After the reunification of Germany in 1990, there were a lot of problems in the East.

Or After the reunification of G ermany in 1990, there were a lot of problems in the eastern part .

After the reunification of gGermany in 1990, there were a lot of problems in the Eastern part. After the reunification of Germany in 1990, there were a lot of problems in the East.

After the reunification of gGermany in 1990, there were a lot of problems in the Eeastern part. After the reunification of Germany in 1990, there were a lot of problems in the eastern part.

There's a lot to be said about this topic, but since im not that famillar with period and this text is just a practise for me, i'm just gonna tell you this;


There's a lot to be said about this topic, but since iI'm not that familliar with the period and this text is just a practisce for me, iI'm just gonna tell you this;: There's a lot to be said about this topic, but since I'm not that familiar with the period and this text is just a practice for me, I'm just gonna tell you this:

There's a lot to be said about this topic, but since iI'm not that familliar with period and this text is just a practisce for me, iI'm just gonna tell you this;: There's a lot to be said about this topic, but since I'm not that familiar with period and this text is just a practice for me, I'm just gonna tell you this:

The noun is always "practice," although British English will use "practise" for the verb.

There's a lot to be said about this topic, but since iI'm not that familliar with that period and this text is just a practise for me, iI'm just gonna tell you this;: There's a lot to be said about this topic, but since I'm not that familiar with that period and this text is just a practise for me, I'm just gonna tell you this:

The people of eastern germany were and still are unsatisified with their treatment after the Reunification.


The people of eastern gGermany were and still are unsatisified with their treatment after the Reunification. The people of eastern Germany were and still are unsatisfied with their treatment after the Reunification.

Tthe people of eEastern gGermany were and still are unsatisified with their treatment after the Rreunification. the people of Eastern Germany were and still are unsatisfied with their treatment after the reunification.

Tthe people of eastern gGermany were and still are unsatisified with their treatment after the Reunification. the people of eastern Germany were and still are unsatisfied with their treatment after the Reunification.

That led them to anger.


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

This anger was dissolved during the refugee crisis in 2015.


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

This anger was dissolvebrought to a head during the refugee crisis in 2015. This anger was brought to a head during the refugee crisis in 2015.

"Dissolved" does not make sense, because it would mean that it disappeared.

This anger was dissolvamplified during the refugee crisis in 2015. This anger was amplified during the refugee crisis in 2015.

"Dissolved" implies it went away/disappeared.

The AfD used this anger in order to gain votes.


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

The AfD used this anger in order to gain votes. The AfD used this anger to gain votes.

"In order" sounds pleonastic here, because the phrase is typically "use something [to v.]" anyway.

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

And now we here, 7 years after their foundation, the AfD threatens to become the second biggest party in all germany(even though they lost votes according to polls during the Corona-Crisis).


And now we here, 7 years after their foundation, the AfD threatens to become the second biggest party in all gof Germany (even though they lost votes according to polls during the Corona-Crisis). And now we here, 7 years after their foundation, the AfD threatens to become the second biggest party in all of Germany (even though they lost votes according to polls during the Corona-Crisis).

And now we here, 7, seven years after their foundation, the AfD threatens to become the second biggest party in all gGermany (even though they lost votes according to polls during the Corona-Crisis). And now, seven years after their foundation, the AfD threatens to become the second biggest party in all Germany (even though they lost votes according to polls during the Corona-Crisis).

Small numbers are generally written out unless you need to emphasize quantity, for example in a math problem. What exactly defines "small" is debatable, but numbers less than ten definitely count.

And now we hehere we are, 7 years after their foundation, the AfD threatens to become the second -biggest party in all gGermany (even though they lostare losing votes according to polls during the Ccorona-Cvirus crisis). And now here we are, 7 years after their foundation, the AfD threatens to become the second-biggest party in all Germany (even though they are losing votes according to polls during the coronavirus crisis).

So should we give them their space in tv and media?


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

So should we give them their space ion tvTV and in media? So should we give them their space on TV and in media?

So should we give them their space in tvTV and media? So should we give them their space in TV and media?

My answer to that is a clear "no".


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

My answer to that is a clear "no"." My answer to that is a clear "no."

Medias can influence people in different shapes.


MThe medias can influence people in different shapeways. The media can influence people in different ways.

Medias can influence people in different shapeways. Media can influence people in different ways.

"Media" is already plural.

MThe medias can influence people in different shapeways. The media can influence people in different ways.

If we let guys such as Höcke influence the younger generation, we're guilty for all their doing, once in power.


If we let guys such as Höcke influence the younger generation, we're guilty for all their doing, once in they are power. If we let guys such as Höcke influence the younger generation, we're guilty for all their doing, once in they are power.

If we let guys such as Höcke influence the younger generation, we're guilty for all their doing, oncat they do, once they are in power. If we let guys such as Höcke influence the younger generation, we're guilty for all that they do, once they are in power.

If we let guys such as Höcke influence the younger generation, we're guilty for allwhat theiry doing, once in power. If we let guys such as Höcke influence the younger generation, we're guilty for what they do in power.

The others are correct as well; I just thought I'd give you a different phrasing.

In other words; if we let anti-democrats their space, we don't protect our democracy and therefore our democracy is vulnerable.


In other words; if we letgive anti-democrats their space, we don't protect our democracy and therefore our democracy is vulnerable. In other words; if we give anti-democrats their space, we don't protect our democracy and therefore our democracy is vulnerable.

In other words;, if we letallow anti-democrats their space, we don't protect our democracy and therefore our democracy is vulnerable. In other words, if we allow anti-democrats their space, we don't protect our democracy and therefore our democracy is vulnerable.

You can "allow" someone something, but you can't "let" it to them (outside of the sense of renting).

In other words;, if we let anti-democrats have their space, we doaren't protecting our democracy and therefore our democracy is vulnerable. In other words, if we let anti-democrats have their space, we aren't protecting our democracy and therefore our democracy is vulnerable.

Democracy is of course also that you can vote who or what you want, but it's also that we ban those, who want to destroy our beloved republic.


Democracy is, of course, also that you can votevoting for who or what you want, but it's also that we ban those, who want to destroy our beloved republic. Democracy is, of course, also voting for who or what you want, but it's also that we ban those who want to destroy our beloved republic.

Democracy ialso means of course also that you can vote for who or what you want, but it's also means that we ban those, who want to destroy our beloved republic. Democracy also means of course that you can vote for who or what you want, but it also means that we ban those who want to destroy our beloved republic.

Democracy is, of course also, that you can vote for who or what you want, but it's also that wealso we have to ban those, who want to destroy our beloved republic. Democracy is, of course, that you can vote for who or what you want, but also we have to ban those who want to destroy our beloved republic.

Moliere once said; "It is not only what we do, but also what we do not do, for which we are accountable" and i find that very fitting


Moliere once said; "It is not only what we do, but also what we do not do, for which we are accountable" and iI find that very fitting. Moliere once said; "It is not only what we do, but also what we do not do, for which we are accountable" and I find that very fitting.

Molieère once said;, "It is not only what we do, but also what we do not do, for which we are accountable," and iI find that very fitting. Molière once said, "It is not only what we do, but also what we do not do, for which we are accountable," and I find that very fitting.

Moliere once said;, "It is not only what we do, but also what we do not do, for which we are accountable," and iI find that very fitting. Moliere once said, "It is not only what we do, but also what we do not do, for which we are accountable," and I find that very fitting.

Little sidenote; I don't want a political discussion here.


Little side-note;: I don't want a political discussion here. Little side-note: I don't want a political discussion here.

Little side-note;: I don't want a political discussion here. Little side-note: I don't want a political discussion here.

Little side-note;: I don't want a political discussion here. Little side-note: I don't want a political discussion here.

There are other spaces for that.


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

Thanks for reading.


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

You need LangCorrect Premium to access this feature.

Go Premium