Comet AI hHelped mMe fFind tTwo gGood vVideos Comet AI Helped Me Find Two Good Videos

I started using Comet - it is, an AI that helps you find media content by description. I started using Comet, an AI that helps you find media content by description.

I started using Comet - it is, an AI that helps you find media content by description. I started using Comet, an AI that helps you find media content by description.

I have found two videos on YouTube that I couldn't finding for a long time. I have found two videos on YouTube that I couldn't find for a long time.

I havet found two videos on YouTube that I couldn't finding for a long time. It found two videos on YouTube that I couldn't find for a long time.

This tool needed a few tries with specific queries but finally solved the tasks. This tool needed a few tries with specific queries but finally solved the tasks.

Does the tool need a few tries, or did you need a few tries with the tool? I'd write, "I needed to try a few specific queries, but the tool eventually solved the task." If you want to keep the focus on the tool, I'd write, "The tool required a few attempts with different queries, but it eventually solved the task."

This tool needed a few tries with specific queries but it finally solved the tasks. This tool needed a few tries with specific queries but it finally solved the tasks.

This toolI needed a few tries with specific queries buto get the tool to work but it finally solved the tasks. I needed a few tries with specific queries to get the tool to work but it finally solved the tasks.

you are querying the tool, the original sentence made it sound like the tool itself was writing the queries

The first video I found was a forty -minutes film about travel through Russia. The first video I found was a forty-minute film about travel through Russia.

The first video I found was a forty minutes-long film about travel through Russia. The first video I found was a forty minute-long film about travel through Russia.

The first video I found was a forty minutes film about traveling through Russia. The first video I found was a forty minute film about traveling through Russia.

It isn't a casual travel show but something special. It isn't a casual travel show but something special.

It isn't a casualn amateur travel show but something special. It isn't an amateur travel show but something special.

After reading further into your paragraph I suspect amateur might be a better fit. Amateur here means produced by someone that hasn't had formal education on the topic, which usually means lower quality or that it shouldn't be judged by professional quality standards. My understanding here is that because the director isn't an amateur, it's okay to judge this work by higher standards, and that it meets that bar.

The director is a very interesting, melancholic person - his name isd Alexsey Saprikin. The director is a very interesting, melancholic person named Alexsey Saprikin.

The director is a very interesting, melancholic person - —his name is Alexsey Saprikin. The director is a very interesting, melancholic person—his name is Alexsey Saprikin.

The em dash is an extra long dash that (for most native speakers) is autocorrected from "--" into — by a computer program, usually Microsoft Word. (To compare, em dash "—" vs "-" a single dash­). I'd say within the last 3-5 years this symbol has become an indicator online that someone is using AI to generate text responses because it isn't a symbol on a regular keyboard, and since most native speakers don't have alternate keyboards installed or know key combinations to generate it otherwise, it means it was copy and pasted from some source. The most likely source right now is an AI, which also coincidentally overuses this grammatical structure. The em dash still has its place in English writing, especially formal writing, but you have to be careful or you may start sounding like an AI chat bot, or (if you start actually using the em dash symbol and not a single dash as a stand-in) that you are copy and pasting responses.

He has a kind of philosopher vibe. He has a kind of philosopher vibe.

I love this use of casual English! It sounds very natural.

InAt the same time, he has been being a part of the author group of fewwriting team for several famous humorcomedy TV shows in Russia (around stand-up area) for 12 years. At the same time, he has been part of the writing team for several famous comedy TV shows in Russia for 12 years.

For TV, we would usually say "writers" rather than "authors". We also would call the genre of TV show "comedy" rather than "humor".

In the sameDuring that time, he hwas been being a part of the author group of few famous humorpart of a group of authors that wrote for a few famous stand-up comedy TV shows in Russia (around stand-up area). This was his job for 12 years. During that time, he was part of a group of authors that wrote for a few famous stand-up comedy TV shows in Russia. This was his job for 12 years.

In the same time he has been being a part of the author group ofor a few famous humor TV shows in Russia (around, particularly in stand-up area)comedy, for 12 years. In the same time he has been a part of the author group for a few famous TV shows in Russia, particularly in stand-up comedy, for 12 years.

He was mostly at the backend of productionworked behind the scenes. He mostly worked behind the scenes.

working "behind the scenes" is the idiom in English that means what you're trying to say here.

He also finished an education in directingearned a degree in directing, which gave the film a more artistic, satirical, and occasionally gloomy tone. He earned a degree in directing, which gave the film a more artistic, satirical, and occasionally gloomy tone.

I combined these two sentences so the reader can see the connection between the two thoughts- his degree in directing and the resulting style choices- more clearly.

He also finished an education in directinghas a director's degree. He also has a director's degree.

He also finished an educationgot his degree in directing. He also got his degree in directing.

Therefore, his travel film turn out not casual with some drops of art, satire and gloom.

(combined with above sentence)

Therefore, his travel film turned out not casual with some dropmore complex, with elements of art, satire and gloom. Therefore, his travel film turned out more complex, with elements of art, satire and gloom.

Therefore, his travel film turn out not casulooked professional with some drops of artartistic, satireical, and gloomy scenes. Therefore, his travel film looked professional with some artistic, satirical, and gloomy scenes.

Had some trouble understanding what you meant by "drops" here. I replaced it with my best guess. "not casual" is not a common way to expressing things related to art and TV production. "high production value" or "professional" would be phrases a native speaker is more likely to use.

I'm not wasn't the only the persone who liked thise film, it's not top of views but all. While it doesn't break records for views, people in the comments are very exitedenjoyed it. I wasn't the only person who liked the film. While it doesn't break records for views, people in the comments enjoyed it.

This is a great place to use "while" to connect the thoughts between you liking the film, it not having a lot of views, and other commenters enjoying it as well.

I'm not only the one who likes this film, it's not top of. It doesn't have many views but all of the people in the comments are very excited. I'm not only the one who likes this film. It doesn't have many views but all of the people in the comments are very excited.

I'm not the only the one who liked this film, it's not top of views but all: while it doesn't have a lot of views, all the people in the comments awere very exited. I'm not the only one who liked this film: while it doesn't have a lot of views, all the people in the comments were very exited.

keep in mind comments in this context is slang / the shortened form of "the comments section," as in, "all the people in the comments section..." etc. That is why it keeps the definite article.

The second video was about the workings of power and it's, called "You Would Be a Terrible Leader"," was about the workings of power. The second video, called "You Would Be a Terrible Leader," was about the workings of power.

This sentence structure reads more naturally in English.

The second video was about the workings of power and, it's called "You Would Be a Terrible Leader" and it gave a lot of insights that aren't immediately obvious. The second video was about the workings of power, it's called "You Would Be a Terrible Leader" and it gave a lot of insights that aren't immediately obvious.

"the workings of power" doesn't sound natural, but I'm not sure how to rewrite it.

The second video was about the workings of powerpolitical theory and it's called "You Would Be a Terrible Leader"." The second video was about political theory and it's called "You Would Be a Terrible Leader."

There are a lot of non-obvious thoughts.(combined with previous sentence) (combined with previous sentence)

There are a lot of non-obvious thoughtsIt was very thought-provoking. It was very thought-provoking.

"thought-provoking" is an idiom and seems like a pretty close fit for what you're trying to say.

But tThe main things that inspired me was aboutere the keys (ministers) of power and that one leader can't make desigcisions on hims opinion ealone. Even if he is a dictator but, he needs to consider the interests of people among him. The main things that inspired me were the keys (ministers) of power and that one leader can't make decisions on his opinion alone. Even if he is a dictator, he needs to consider the interests of people among him.

But the main thought that inspired me was about keys (ministers) of power, and that one leader can't make desigcisions on him opinion even he is a dictator but he need tobased solely on their opinion. Even a dictator must consider the interests of the people amonground him. But the main thought that inspired me was about keys (ministers) of power, and that one leader can't make decisions based solely on their opinion. Even a dictator must consider the interests of the people around him.

It's better to use the gender-neutral "their" because a leader can be male or female

But the main thing that inspired me was about keys (ministers)the "keys" of power, and that one leader can't make desigcisions based only on hims own opinions even if he is a dictator but h. He needs to consider interests of the people among himin his inner circle, who are the "keys" to his power. But the main thing that inspired me was about the "keys" of power, and that one leader can't make decisions based only on his own opinions even if he is a dictator. He needs to consider interests of the people in his inner circle, who are the "keys" to his power.

you are introducing and defining a metaphor for us, the reader, for the "keys" of power. That is why I added the metaphor again at the end, to help tie it all together.