Dec. 28, 2023
A Bug in the LangCorrect System
I edit a post 4 to 5 times on average. Recently, I've noticed that if I publish a post and later revise or edit the content, the system will not delete the words I removed. Instead, it retains the original sentences and displays the revisions. As a result, both the original and edited sentences will be present on the proofreader's side. For example, if I edit 5 sentences in my journal entry, the proofreader will see 10 repeated sentences—5 being the original versions and the remaining 5 being the revised ones.
I don't know if there is a solution to it, so I try to refrain from editing my post after publishing it by adopting a pre-publishing editing routine. However, the problem is that I often overlook mistakes or areas for improvement when reviewing my work. I usually cannot spot any grammatical mistakes, unnatural phrasings, or misspellings in my journal entry until after I publish it.
I suppose I should take a break between writing and editing. Stepping away from my writing and returning to it with a fresh, more objective point of view should help me notice errors more effectively.
Correction Settings
A Bug in the LangCorrect System
I edit a post 4 to 5four to five times on average.
I edit a post four to five times on average.
Recently, I've noticed that if I publish a post and later revise or edit the content, the system will not delete the words I removed. Recently, I've noticed that if I publish a post and later revise or edit the content, the system will not delete the words I removed.
I have noticed this bug, but it seems to happen randomly.
Instead, it retains the original sentences and displays the revisions.
As a result, both the original and edited sentences will be present on the proofreader's side.
For example, if I edit 5 sentences in my journal entry, the proofreader will see 10 repeated sentences—5 being the original versions and the remaining 5 being the revised iones.
For example, if I edit 5 sentences in my journal entry, the proofreader will see 10 repeated sentences—5 original versions and 5 being revisions.
I don't know if there is a solution to it, so I'll try to refrain from editing my post after publishing it by adopting a pre-publishing editing routine. I don't know if there is a solution to it, so I'll try to refrain from editing my post after publishing it by adopting a pre-publishing editing routine.
However, the problem is that I often overlook mistakes or areas for improvement when reviewing my work.
I usually cannot spot any grammatical mistakes, unnatural phrasings, or misspellings in my journal entry until after I publish it.
I suppose I should take a break between writing and editing.
Stepping away from my writing and returning to it with a fresh, more objective point of view should help me notice errors more effectively.
Feedback
Very well written.
March 15, 2024
Thank you for your corrections!
Recently, I've noticed that if I publish a post and later revise or edit the content, the system will not delete the words I removed. Recently, I've noticed that if I publish a post and later revise or edit the content, the system will not delete the words I removed.
Ah, yeah, I think that's because it stores each sentence separately. But also the system doesn't always know how to break sentences apart in the first place.
For example, if I edit 5 sentences in my journal entry, the proofreader will see 10 repeated sentences—5 being the original versions and the remaining 5 being theoriginals and 5 revised iones.
For example, if I edit 5 sentences in my journal entry, the proofreader will see 10 repeated sentences—5 originals and 5 revisions.
Stepping away from my writing and returning to it with a fresh, more objective point of view shouldmay help me notice errors more effectively.
Stepping away from my writing and returning to it with a fresh, more objective point of view may help me notice errors more effectively.
Personally, this feels more like a "may" than a "should", but it's just a personal preference. I think the nuance is probably just that "should" suggests some level of authoritativeness whereas it feels to me more like you're speculating on the outcome, thus "may" which is a bit more speculative feels more accurate to me.
Feedback
Very well written.
Dec. 30, 2023
Thank you so much for your corrections!
A Bug in the LangCorrect System
I edit a post 4 to 5four to five times on average.
I edit a post four to five times on average.
any number less than 11, use the English version
Recently, I've noticed that if I publish a post and later revise or edit the content, the system will not delete the words I removed.
Instead, it retains the original sentences and displays the revisions.
As a result, both the original and edited sentences will be present on the proofreader's side.
For example, if I edit 5 sentences in my journal entry, the proofreader will see 10 repeated sentences—5 being the original versions and the remaining 5 being the revised ones. For example, if I edit 5 sentences in my journal entry, the proofreader will see 10 repeated sentences—5 being the original versions and the remaining 5 being the revised ones.
same number correction but it's not very important
I don't know if there is a solution to it, so I try to refrain from editing my post after publishing it by adopting a pre-publishing editing routine.
However, the problem is that I often overlook mistakes or areas for improvement when reviewing my work.
I usually cannot spot any grammatical mistakes, unnatural phrasings, or misspellings in my journal entry until after I publish it.
I suppose I should take a break between writing and editing.
Stepping away from my writing and returning to it with a fresh, more objective point of view should help me notice errors more effectively.
Feedback
Very well written! There were no grammatical errors at all. I do the same when I write: I write the sentences first, and then I reread at least once before I publish it to ensure that I didn't make any spelling or grammatical mistakes
Dec. 28, 2023
Thank you so much, @sylvanas!
|
A Bug in the LangCorrect System This sentence has been marked as perfect! This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
I edit a post 4 to 5 times on average.
I edit a post any number less than 11, use the English version
I edit a post |
|
Recently, I've noticed that if I publish a post and later revise or edit the content, the system will not delete the words I removed. This sentence has been marked as perfect! Recently, I've noticed that if I publish a post and later revise or edit the content, the system will not delete the words I removed. Recently, I've noticed that if I publish a post and later revise or edit the content, the system will not delete the words I removed. Ah, yeah, I think that's because it stores each sentence separately. But also the system doesn't always know how to break sentences apart in the first place. Recently, I've noticed that if I publish a post and later revise or edit the content, the system will not delete the words I removed. Recently, I've noticed that if I publish a post and later revise or edit the content, the system will not delete the words I removed. I have noticed this bug, but it seems to happen randomly. |
|
Instead, it retains the original sentences and displays the revisions. This sentence has been marked as perfect! This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
As a result, both the original and edited sentences will be present on the proofreader's side. This sentence has been marked as perfect! This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
For example, if I edit 5 sentences in my journal entry, the proofreader will see 10 repeated sentences—5 being the original versions and the remaining 5 being the revised ones. For example, if I edit 5 sentences in my journal entry, the proofreader will see 10 repeated sentences—5 being the original versions and the remaining 5 being the revised ones. For example, if I edit 5 sentences in my journal entry, the proofreader will see 10 repeated sentences—5 being the original versions and the remaining 5 being the revised ones. same number correction but it's not very important
For example, if I edit 5 sentences in my journal entry, the proofreader will see 10 repeated sentences—5
For example, if I edit 5 sentences in my journal entry, the proofreader will see 10 repeated sentences—5 |
|
I don't know if there is a solution to it, so I try to refrain from editing my post after publishing it by adopting a pre-publishing editing routine. This sentence has been marked as perfect! I don't know if there is a solution to it, so I'll try to refrain from editing my post after publishing it by adopting a pre-publishing editing routine. I don't know if there is a solution to it, so I'll try to refrain from editing my post after publishing it by adopting a pre-publishing editing routine. |
|
However, the problem is that I often overlook mistakes or areas for improvement when reviewing my work. This sentence has been marked as perfect! This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
I usually cannot spot any grammatical mistakes, unnatural phrasings, or misspellings in my journal entry until after I publish it. This sentence has been marked as perfect! This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
I suppose I should take a break between writing and editing. This sentence has been marked as perfect! This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
Stepping away from my writing and returning to it with a fresh, more objective point of view should help me notice errors more effectively. This sentence has been marked as perfect!
Stepping away from my writing and returning to it with a fresh, more objective point of view Personally, this feels more like a "may" than a "should", but it's just a personal preference. I think the nuance is probably just that "should" suggests some level of authoritativeness whereas it feels to me more like you're speculating on the outcome, thus "may" which is a bit more speculative feels more accurate to me. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
You need LangCorrect Premium to access this feature.
Go Premium