Scarlett_Father's avatar
Scarlett_Father

March 20, 2024

0
Who has the right to legalize marijuana

Today, I met a doctor. I ask her opinion about marijuana legalization in Canada. She seemed a bit excited and said most of her colleagues disagreed with it, but could do nothing.

I think when itis comes to the uptrend of marijuana legalization, is it categorized as a medical problem or a social issue? If it's a medical problem, then doctors make it; otherwise, politicians lobby for regulations.

Corrections (4)
Correction Settings
Choose how corrections are organized

Only show inserted text
Word-level diffs are planned for a future update.

Scarlett_Father's avatar
Scarlett_Father

March 20, 2024

0
0

Scarlett_Father's avatar
Scarlett_Father

March 20, 2024

0

She seemed a bit excited and said most of her colleagues disagreed with it, but could do nothing.

Scarlett_Father's avatar
Scarlett_Father

March 20, 2024

0

Today, I met a doctor.

Scarlett_Father's avatar
Scarlett_Father

March 20, 2024

0

Who has the right to legalize marijuana


Who has the right to legalize marijuana? Who has the right to legalize marijuana?

Who has the right to legalize marijuana? Who has the right to legalize marijuana?

I presume this title is in the form of a question about who should be allowed to legalize marijuana, in which case, having a question mark at the end may be a good idea.

Today, I met a doctor.


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

I ask her opinion about marijuana legalization in Canada.


I asked her opinion about marijuana legalization in Canada. I asked her opinion about marijuana legalization in Canada.

I asked for her opinion about marijuanathe legalization of marijuana in Canada. I asked for her opinion about the legalization of marijuana in Canada.

I asked her opinion about marijuana legalization in Canada. I asked her opinion about marijuana legalization in Canada.

I asked her opinion about marijuana legalization in Canada. I asked her opinion about marijuana legalization in Canada.

For regular English verbs like 'ask', be sure to add 'ed' to the end to show it happened in the past.

She seemed a bit excited and said most of her colleagues disagreed with it, but could do nothing.


She seemed a bit excited and said most of her colleagues disagreed with it, but could do nothing. She seemed a bit excited and said most of her colleagues disagreed with it but could do nothing.

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

She seemed a bit excited and said most of her colleagues disagreed with it, but couldn't do noanything. She seemed a bit excited and said most of her colleagues disagreed with it, but couldn't do anything.

SheEven though she herself seemed a bit excited and said, most of her colleagues disagreed with it, but could do nothingthe new legislation. Furthermore, despite her colleagues' disagreement, there was nothing they could do about it. Even though she herself seemed excited, most of her colleagues disagreed with the new legislation. Furthermore, despite her colleagues' disagreement, there was nothing they could do about it.

I just reworded the sentence to add some clarifications to make it more clear. For example, when you say 'She seemed a bit excited and said most of her colleagues disagreed with it', it is unclear whether the colleagues are disappointed about the fact that the doctor being happy, or the new marijuana legislation.

I think when itis comes to the uptrend of marijuana legalization, is it categorized as a medical problem or a social issue?


I think wWhen itis comes to the uptrend of marijuana legalization, is it categorized as a medical problem or a social issue? When it comes to the trend of marijuana legalization, is it categorized as a medical problem or a social issue?

I think wWhen itis comes to the uptrend of marijuana legalization, is it categorized as a medical problemissue or a social issue? When it comes to the uptrend of marijuana legalization, is it categorized as a medical issue or a social issue?

Run-on sentence if you add "I think" at the start. It's unnecessary to convey what you're thinking about since you pose the question in second clause. Better also to use "issue" to be consistent

I thinkwonder if, when itis comes to the uptrend of marijuana legalization, is itt should be categorized as a medical problem or a social issue? I wonder if, when it comes to the trend of marijuana legalization, it should be categorized as a medical problem or a social issue?

Use "wonder", "think" signifies an opinion

I think when itis comes to the uptrend of marijuana legalization, is it important to decide whether it should be categorized as a medical problem or a social issue?. I think when it comes to the uptrend of marijuana legalization, is it important to decide whether it should be categorized as a medical problem or a social issue.

If it's a medical problem, then doctors make it; otherwise, politicians lobby for regulations.


If it's a medical problem, then doctors makecan make a decision about it; otherwise, politicians lobby for regulations. If it's a medical problem, then doctors can make a decision about it; otherwise, politicians lobby for regulations.

If it's a medical problemissue, then let doctors make itdecisions; otherwise, politicians lobby for regulations. If it's a medical issue, then let doctors make decisions; otherwise, politicians lobby for regulations.

If it's a medical problem, then doctors make itshould decide; otherwise, politicians should lobby for regulations. If it's a medical problem, then doctors should decide; otherwise, politicians should lobby for regulations.

Added conditionals with "should" here and in the previous sentence because we are talking about hypotheticals.

If it's a medical problem, then doctors make it; otherwise, politicians lobby for regulationshould have the final say on whether marijuana should be legalized. Otherwise, politicians will create legislation based on their own interests. If it's a medical problem, then doctors should have the final say on whether marijuana should be legalized. Otherwise, politicians will create legislation based on their own interests.

You need LangCorrect Premium to access this feature.

Go Premium