The listening section completely refutes the reading passage in the fact thatits opinion on whether or not it is benefit to store patients' medical records in electronic databases rather than traditional paper-based records. The listening section completely refutes the reading passage in its opinion on whether or not it is benefit to store patients' medical records in electronic databases rather than traditional paper-based records.

First, the reading says that using electronic records not only can reduce costs by saving money on storing and transferring paper records, but also can allow doctors canto easily access the records from almost everanywhere when necessary. First, the reading says that using electronic records not only can reduce costs by saving money on storing and transferring paper records, but also can allow doctors to easily access the records from almost anywhere when necessary.

However, the lecturer points out that electronic records are unlikely significredundant, since doctors keep paper records for emergency backup and signatures needed for legal reasons. However, the lecturer points out that electronic records are redundant since doctors keep paper records for emergency backup and signatures needed for legal reasons.

So, ithey would still have to pay for space cost for storing paper records. So, they would still have to pay for space for storing paper records.

Second, the reading passage mentions that one of the = electronic records' advantages is that it can decrease the chances of medical errors in spite ofdue to handwriting. Second, the reading passage mentions that one of the electronic records' advantages is that it can decrease the chances of medical errors due to handwriting.

So that it canThat can help prevent any serious consequences for the patients' health. That can help prevent any serious consequences for the patients' health.

Yet, the listening part argues that doctors still use paper towhen examineing patients , takeing notes, and writing prescription by Hans. Yet, the listening argues that doctors still use paper when examining patients, taking notes, and writing prescriptions.

Office staffs, later time, interpret enter the information into the electronic databases byat a later time, and poor handwriting willcan cause some errors at that time as well. Office staff enter the information into electronic databases at a later time, and poor handwriting can cause some errors at that time as well.

LastFinally, the author thinks that electronic records can aid medical research. Finally, the author thinks that electronic records can aid medical research.

With tThe electronic records, these will can provide needed information and can be accessed from any place for research benefits. The electronic records can provide needed information and can be accessed from any place for research benefits.

Likewise, the speaker from the listening passage asserts that it is not necessaelectronic records are not very beneficial, itas it is still find difficult to collect data from electronic records, since there issuch records due to extremely strict privacy laws in Uthe U.S. Likewise, the speaker from the listening passage asserts that electronic records are not very beneficial, as it is still difficult to collect data from such records due to extremely strict privacy laws in the U.S.

Andlso, access to some of information areis not guaranteed for some, as patients can block information for any purposereason they wish. Also, access to some information is not guaranteed, as patients can block information for any reason they wish.