I will focus on my English studies for the next two weeks. I will focus on my English studies for the next two weeks.

posseive

I will focus on English studiesstudying English for the next two weeks. I will focus on studying English for the next two weeks.

Using “studying English” is more natural after the phrase “focus on.” While “English studies” is grammatically correct, it sounds formal and less common. English usually prefers a gerund (verb+ing) after “focus on,” which clearly shows the action you are concentrating on.

I also can't write well in English without Grammarly and a translator. I also can't write well in English without Grammarly and a translator.

Adding "also" here sounds more natural and flows better with the previous sentence.

I can'’t write well in English without Grammarly andor a translator. I can’t write well in English without Grammarly or a translator.

When presenting alternatives, “or” is more appropriate than “and.”

Of course, I am writing my journal here myself, but I still get helped by the Grammaly tool. Of course, I am writing my journal here myself, but I still get helped by the Grammaly tool.

Of course, I am writing my journal here myself, but I still get helped by Grammarly tool. Of course, I am writing my journal here myself, but I still get helped by Grammarly.

With names of services like "Grammarly", I'd usually just say the name like this.

Of course, I am writing my journal here by myself, but I still get helped bysome help from the Grammarly tool. Of course, I am writing my journal here by myself, but I still get some help from the Grammarly tool.

The phrase “get helped by” is not natural; the correct expression is “get help from.” Adding “some” makes the sentence sound more natural and conversational.

So, I found this book on my shelf: Grammar in Use Basic! I found this book on my shelf: Grammar in Use Basic!

Starting with “So” is unnecessary in this context. Beginning the sentence directly with the main clause makes it clearer.

I will read this book for the next two weeks. I will read this book for the next two weeks.

I will read this book over the next two weeks. I will read this book over the next two weeks.

In a sentence like this, I would probably put in "over the" or "for the". Same with actions in the past too, like in: "I've been reading an interesting book over the past few weeks." Although, "over the" feels more like YOU are doing something over a period of time, whereas "for the" has more of a feeling like something is happening TO you, or unrelated to you. For example: "For the next few months, the weather will be hot." But the difference is minor.

I will read this book over the next two weeks. I will read this book over the next two weeks.

“Over the next two weeks” is the correct and more natural expression for a time period.

I am not going to answerdo the quizzes. I am not going to do the quizzes.

“Do the quizzes” is more idiomatic than “answer the quizzes” because it conveys completing them as part of the study plan.

If I did, I probably would try to answer perfectly every time, would beget stressed, and I would eventually lose my interest in the book. If I did, I probably would try to answer perfectly every time, get stressed, and eventually lose my interest in the book.

If I did, I probably would try to answer perfectly every time, would beget stressed, and I would eventually lose my interest in the book. If I did, I probably would try to answer perfectly every time, get stressed, and eventually lose interest in the book.

If I did, I would probably would try to answer perfectly every time,every question perfectly, which would be stressed, and I woul me out and eventually make me lose my interest in the book. If I did, I would probably try to answer every question perfectly, which would stress me out and eventually make me lose interest in the book.

The original sentence is a fragment with multiple clauses. Combining the ideas into one sentence with “which would stress me out” makes it grammatically correct and smoother. Adding “every question” makes the meaning clearer and more precise.

I learned English mostly through conversation, so I am not very good at English grammar and often speak broken English in conversation. I learned English mostly through conversation, so I am not very good at grammar and often speak broken English.

Adding “mostly” clarifies that conversation was the primary way of learning. Repeating “in conversation” is unnecessary and can make the sentence sound awkward. Using “not very good” is more idiomatic than “not good.”

Since I will start it tomorrow morning, so I planned my study schedule this evening. Since I will start tomorrow morning, I planned my study schedule this evening.

The original sentence is correct, this is to make it sound more natural.

I will start it tomorrow morning, so I planned my study schedule this evening. I will start tomorrow morning, so I planned my study schedule this evening.

I will start it tomorrow morning, so I planned my study schedule this eveningonight. I will start tomorrow morning, so I planned my study schedule tonight.

The word “it” is unnecessary because “start” already refers to the planned activity. Using “tonight” instead of “this evening” is simpler and more natural in casual writing.

Also, I only have ten days, which is not enough time to finish the book. Also, I only have ten days, which is not enough time to finish the book.

Adding the word “time” makes the sentence clearer and more natural. Without it, the sentence feels slightly incomplete.

Only three hours per day, in the morning, reading the book as much as possible and finish entire book to read. Only three hours per day, in the morning, reading the book as much as possible.

I'm not sure what was meant by "finish entire book to read" since in the last sentence you said you wouldn't be able to finish in time.

Only three hours per day, in the morning, reading the book as much as possible [and finish entire book to read?]. Only three hours per day, in the morning, reading the book as much as possible [and finish entire book to read?].

Unfortunately, I don't quite understand what you mean by "and finish entire book to read".

Only three hours per day, in theI will study for three hours every morning, reading as much of the book as much as possible and finish entire book to readpossible, with the only goal of finishing it. I will study for three hours every morning, reading as much of the book as possible, with the only goal of finishing it.

The original sentence is a fragment without a clear subject and main verb. Starting with “I will study” gives it structure. “Finish entire book to read” is not idiomatic; “finishing it” is simpler, grammatically correct, and more natural.

It is my only goal.

I will write about my study journey here. I will write about my study journey here.

I hope this moment will become the firm foundation of my English for the future. I hope this moment will become the firm foundation of my English for the future.

I hope this moment will be thecome a firm foundation ofor my English forin the future. I hope this moment will become a firm foundation for my English in the future.

Everything after "become" isn't strictly necessary, and is simply a more natural way you could say this.

I hope this momenttime will be the firmcome a solid foundation ofor my English forin the future. I hope this time will become a solid foundation for my English in the future.

“Moment” fits better as “time” in this context because it refers to a period of effort rather than a single instant. “For the future” is less idiomatic than “in the future,” which is the standard way to refer to long-term goals. Using “become a solid foundation” sounds more natural and fluent than “will be the firm foundation.”