Some people reckon that they should help the local community or give people direct help, while others argue that the best way to give a favorassist is to give money to charities. Some people reckon that they should help the local community or give people direct help, while others argue that the best way to assist is to give money to charities.

Assist sounds more natural here

In my opinion, I agree with the former view. I agree with the former view.

You are giving your opinion by saying that you agree with the first view. So saying 'In my opinion, I agree...' is overkill. It isn't incorrect, it just sounds odd.

On the one hand, people who believe in charitable organizations may holdfeel that they can allocate public money equally and effectively. On the one hand, people who believe in charitable organizations may feel that they can allocate public money equally and effectively.

For example, some non-profit institutions may help schools from deprived areas with teaching facilities likesuch as building multi-functional classrooms, and recruiting well-qualified facultiesstaff. For example, some non-profit institutions may help schools from deprived areas with teaching facilities such as building multi-functional classrooms, and recruiting well-qualified staff.

When you use the word recruit in this context you are usually talking about people, so staff sounds better. You may be using faculty to refer to a group of teaching staff but even then I think it is better to talk about recruiting individual staff as you wouldn't typically recruit all staff members within a faculty at the same time.

In this way, children from less well-off families can have access to a sound a education, therefore they c and break the poverty cirycle to become contributing members of society. In this way, children from less well-off families can have access to a sound education and break the poverty cycle to become contributing members of society.

For instance, in China, there are numerous organizations that raise money from the public in the name ofby claiming that they are extending a helping hand to those under the poverty line. For instance, in China, there are numerous organizations that raise money from the public by claiming that they are extending a helping hand to those under the poverty line.

But actually what they did wao is put this money into their own pocket, leaving the poor to die. But actually what they do is put this money into their own pocket, leaving the poor to die.

For this reason, citizens should give a favor to those people in a straight waassist people directly, instead of bythrough agencies. For this reason, citizens should assist people directly, instead of through agencies.

In conclusion, although some non-profit agencies can allocate money effectively and quickly, I still opinbelieve that people should help destitute people directly in case oforder to avoid corruption. In conclusion, although some non-profit agencies can allocate money effectively and quickly, I still believe that people should help destitute people directly in order to avoid corruption.

Opine isn't wrong but it wouldn't be used often in everyday speech or writing.