I'm now atin my late 20s. I'm now in my late 20s.

We don't use "at" here.

I'm now atin my late 20s. I'm now in my late 20s.

I'm now atin my late 20s. I'm now in my late 20s.

not 到

Looking back aton my short life, I haven't achieved much. Looking back on my short life, I haven't achieved much.

I think "look back on" more strongly implies some reflection on the past.

Looking back at my short life, I haven't achieved much. Looking back at my short life, I haven't achieved much.

Looking back atWithin my short life,time I haven't achieved much. Within my short lifetime I haven't achieved much.

nah youve achieved alot

By no means am I in a position to complain about my soread life here. By no means am I in a position to complain about my sad life here.

(1) The phrase is "complain about (something)". (2) I don't think "sore" is used this way. Instead, you can consider using "sad" or something else along those lines.

By no means am I to complain my soreing about my life here. By no means am I complaining about my life here.

Not exactly sure what you meant by including “sore”

BI am by no means am I to complainwhining about my soread life here. I am by no means whining about my sad life here.

What I want to tell you, is, during even the hardest of times, I never thought about giving up one certainparticular thing — reading. What I want to tell you is, during even the hardest of times, I never thought about giving up one particular thing — reading.

The placement of the comma is unnatural.

What I want to tell you, is during even the hardest times, I never thought about giving up on one certain thing — reading. What I want to tell you, is during even the hardest times, I never thought about giving up on one certain thing — reading.

What I want to tell you, is that during even the hardest times, I had never thought about giving up one certain thing — reading. What I want to tell you is that during even the hardest times I had never thought about giving up one thing — reading

The power of reading is exponentialimmense. The power of reading is immense.

"Exponential" is not used this way. It is used to describe a rate, such as in the phrase "the company's exponential growth" or "the exponential increase in food prices". One possible word you can use here instead is "immense".

The power of reading is exponential. The power of reading is exponential.

The Thing I Do IConsistently The Thing I Do Consistently

"Insistently" implies some stubbornness. I think "consistently" is more appropriate here.

The Thing I Do IConsistently The Thing I Do Consistently

The Tthings I Ddo Iconsistently The things I do consistently

there's 100 other ways to word it, but this is the best one

place.

place.

All the wisdoms from our ancestors that has ever existed in the world hais now laied down on the sheets of paper, and all you need to do is pick up the book. All the wisdom from our ancestors that has ever existed in the world is now laid down on sheets of paper, and all you need to do is pick up the book.

"Wisdom" is generally an uncountable noun.

All the wisdoms from of our ancestors who ever existed in the world has now liedbeen written down on the sheets of paper, and all you need to do is pick up thea book. All the wisdom of our ancestors who ever existed in the world has now been written down on sheets of paper, and all you need to do is pick up a book.

All the wisdoms from our ancestors ever exist in the world has now lied down on thehas been laid out on sheets of paper,s and all you need to do is pick up the book. and learn. All the wisdom from our ancestors has been laid out on sheets of papers and all you need to do is pick up the book and learn.

true

Nevertheless, I'm not a utilitarian inwhen it comes to reading. Nevertheless, I'm not a utilitarian when it comes to reading.

I rephrased the sentence so that it sounds more natural.

Nevertheless, I'm not utilitarian in reading. Nevertheless, I'm not utilitarian in reading.

Utilitarian here is out of place. You could say “I don’t just read as a utilitarian practice” or similar. Note that “utilitarian” is a pretty formal word.

Nevertheless, I'm not utilitarian in reading.reading for practical purposes. Nevertheless, I'm not reading for practical purposes.

utilitarian is a super uncommon word

I read because I enjoy it, not for learning some specific knowledge. I read because I enjoy it, not for learning some specific knowledge.

When I read, my mind collides with the author's;, our spirits communicating despite age and(or?)or location. When I read, my mind collides with the author's, our spirits communicating despite age or location.

(1) The use of the semicolon is unnatural here. For simplicity, you can think of the semicolon as a period in this context. Realise that "Our spirits communicating despite age or location" is not a complete sentence! (2) "Or" would sound more natural here, because just one of those things is enough to prevent direct communication with the author. (3) I think "location" is more appropriate than "place" here.

When I read, my mind collides with the author's; our spirits communicatinge despite age and(or?) place. When I read, my mind collides with the author's; our spirits communicate despite age and place.

When I read, my mind collides with the author's; our spirits communicating despite age and(/or?) place. When I read, my mind collides with the author; our spirits communicating despite age and/or place.

Lao Zzi died thousands of years ago, yet his philosophy is still alive today, and can be appreciated by everany admirer. Laozi died thousands of years ago, yet his philosophy is still alive today, and can be appreciated by any admirer.

(1) In English, "Laozi" is most commonly spelt as one word. (2) Instead of "admirer", you could also say "follower".

Lao Zi died thousands of years ago, yet his philosophy is still alive today, and can be appreciated by every admirer. Lao Zi died thousands of years ago, yet his philosophy is still alive today and can be appreciated by every admirer.

Lao Zi died thousands of years ago, yet his philosophy is still alive today, and can be appreciated by every admirer.and appreciated today. Lao Zi died thousands of years ago, yet his philosophy is still alive and appreciated today.

you taoist bro?

What else hasIs there anything more beautyiful than that? Is there anything more beautiful than that?

Your original sentence is grammatical, but can be made to sound more natural.

What else has more beauty than that? What has more beauty than that?

What else hais more beauty than thatiful? What else is more beautiful?

Go to read, my friend. Go read, my friend.

It is generally much more natural to omit the "to" in such a context.

Go to read, my friend. Go read, my friend.

Go to read, my friend. Go read, my friend.

For in doing so can youyou can truly be free. For in doing so you can truly be free.

We will use "can you" if the sentence also contains "only": "For only in doing so can you truly be free."

For iIn doing so can, you truly bbecome free. In doing so, you become free.

For in doing so, you can you truly be free. For in doing so, you can truly be free.