Jack's avatar
Jack

Feb. 15, 2021

0
Journal

Hey sue! The highlighted part is just what my thoughts are, and that is expressed clearly in the original sentence in our group. The only difference is that you described "lost" which referred to in the second sentence as "notional verb", but I stated it as "predicate verb(谓语动词)" So I think it is just a misunderstanding. But it doesn't matter, which indicates that you are extremely right and I also didn't make mistakes. So we are both right haha. Anyway I really appreciate your help. Thank you a million.

Corrections (2)
Correction Settings
Choose how corrections are organized

Only show inserted text
Word-level diffs are planned for a future update.

Anyway I really appreciate your help.

Thank you a million.

Jack's avatar
Jack

Feb. 15, 2021

0

Journal

Hey sue!

The highlighted part is just what my thoughts are, and that is expressed clearly in the original sentence in our group.

The only difference is that you described "lost" which referred to in the second sentence as "notional verb", but I stated it as "predicate verb(谓语动词)" So I think it is just a misunderstanding.

So we are both right haha.

Anyway I really appreciate your help.

Jack's avatar
Jack

Feb. 15, 2021

0

Journal


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

Hey sue!


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

Hey sSue! Hey Sue!

The highlighted part is just what my thoughts are, and that is expressed clearly in the original sentence in our group.


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

The highlighted part is just what my thoughts are, and that isey are expressed clearly in the original sentence in our group. The highlighted part is just what my thoughts are, and they are expressed clearly in the original sentence in our group.

Tense mismatch: "thoughts are" (plural) vs. "that is" (singular). Also consider clarifying what "the original sentence" and "in our group" refer to. (I feel past tense for the second part is likely correct here.)

The only difference is that you described "lost" which referred to in the second sentence as "notional verb", but I stated it as "predicate verb(谓语动词)" So I think it is just a misunderstanding.


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

The only difference is that you described the word "lost", which is referred to in the second sentence, as a "notional verb", but I stateddescribe it as a "predicate verb(谓语动词)" S", so I think it is just a misunderstanding. The only difference is that you described the word "lost", which is referred to in the second sentence, as a "notional verb", but I describe it as a "predicate verb", so I think it is just a misunderstanding.

But it doesn't matter, which indicates that you are extremely right and I also didn't make mistakes.


But it doesn't matter, which indicates that you are extremely right and I also didn't make mistakes. But it doesn't matter, which indicates that you are extremely right and I also didn't make mistakes.

This is a little bit awkward, you could try: But it doesn't matter, you are 100% right and my suggestion too was also not wrong.

But it doesn't matter, which indicates that you are extremely right and I also didwasn't make mistakesn. But it doesn't matter, which indicates that you are right and I also wasn't mistaken.

I don't think it's possible to be "extremely right": you're either right or not.

So we are both right haha.


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

So we are both right haha. So we are both right haha.

"haha" is suitable when casually writing on the Internet.

Anyway I really appreciate your help.


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

Thank you a million.


Thank you a million. Thank you a million.

Thanks a million.

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

You need LangCorrect Premium to access this feature.

Go Premium