Twitter should be banned or should be restricted under the law Twitter should be banned or should be restricted under the law

Twitter should be banned or should be under theubject to stricter laws. Twitter should be banned or subject to stricter laws.

Extremism has been something common amongin society for millennia, but it was usually hidden and was likely to exposurebe seen only in some specifics topic contexts. Extremism has been something common in society for millennia, but it was usually hidden likely to be seen only in some specific contexts.

Extremism has always been somethingwhat common amongwithin societyies, but it was usually hidden and was likely to exposure only in someould only arise in relation to specifics topics. Extremism has always been somewhat common within societies, but it was usually hidden and would only arise in relation to specific topics.

Sure, but underYet, what kinds of laws should we put Twitter be subject to? Yet, what kinds of laws should Twitter be subject to?

Sure,You may ask: but under what kind of law should we put Twitter? You may ask: but under what kind of law should we put Twitter?

Thus, we will guarantee a social media free of hate speech orand extremist content. Thus, we will guarantee a social media free of hate speech and extremist content.

ThusIn this way, we will guarantee a social media platform free of hate speech orand extremist content. In this way, we will guarantee a social media platform free of hate speech and extremist content.

Let me explain: in my opinion Twitter was, has been, and will be a place for conflicts, gossiping, and bravelfiery debates. Let me explain: in my opinion Twitter was, has been, and will be a place for conflicts, gossiping, and fiery debates.

Let me explain: in my opinion Twitter was, has beenis, and will continue to be a place for conflicts, gossiping, and bravely debates. Let me explain: in my opinion Twitter was, is, and will continue to be a place for conflicts, gossip, and brave debates.

So much so, that important politicians have taken part ofin thisese violent debates, and have also make fun of people. So much so, that important politicians have taken part in these violent debates, and also make fun of people.

So much so, that important politicians have taken part ofin thisese violent debates, and have also make fun of people. So much so, that important politicians have taken part in these violent debates, and also make fun of people.

It seems odd to start a sentence with "So much so": it should be merged into the previous sentence. (Also, it the adjective mysteriously changed from "brave" to "violent", which is problematic in an argumentative piece.)

This is not the only problem, and not even the most important, because t. There is another crucial issue in this website: the extremismt claimsontent within it. This is not the only problem, and not even the most important. There is another crucial issue in this website: the extremist content within it.

This is not the only problem, not even the most important, because there is a crucial issue in this website: the extremismt claims within it. This is not the only problem, not even the most important, because there is a crucial issue in this website: extremist claims.

However, the communication in the world of todayinformation age has allowed tohe spread of hate speechs, or, and extremismt messages which is sometimes the same, with anith a previously unthinkable ease. However, the information age has allowed the spread of hate speech, and extremist messages with a previously unthinkable ease.

However, themodern global communication in the world of today has allowed tohe spread of hate speechs, or and extremismt message ing (which isare sometimes the same,) with an unthinkable ease. However, modern global communication has allowed the spread of hate speech and extremist messaging (which are sometimes the same) with unthinkable ease.

Consider "extremist propaganda" instead of "extremist messaging".

This situation is alike in almost all the varieties of social media, but being that is Twitter the most importantwidespread one, we should put it undersubject it to the law. This situation is alike in almost all the varieties of social media, but being that is Twitter the most widespread one, we should subject it to the law.

This situation is alike insimilar for almost all the varieties of social media, but beingsince Twitter is the most important one, we should purestrict it under the law. This situation is similar for almost all social media, but since Twitter is the most important one, we should restrict it under the law.

This canmay be a controversial statement, but I would say that Twitter should be banned or put under thesubject to stricter laws. This may be a controversial statement, but I would say that Twitter should be banned or subject to stricter laws.

This canmight be a controversial statement, but I would say that Twitter should be banned or putrestricted under the law. This might be a controversial statement, but I would say that Twitter should be banned or restricted under the law.

You could probably just go straight to "This is a controversial statement".

Under a common law,I believe it should be subject to something like an "electronic law", aimed to only to control the material which is likely to be offensive, discriminatory, or extremist. I believe it should be subject to something like an "electronic law", aimed only to control the material which is likely to be offensive, discriminatory, or extremist.

Under a common law, something like an "electronic law" aimed ato only control theling material which is likely to be offensive, discriminatory, or extremist. Under a common law, something like an "electronic law" aimed at controlling material which is likely offensive, discriminatory, or extremist.