Our company is in the first tier of the IT industry. Our company is in the first tier of the IT industry.

Our company is in the first tier of the IT industry. Our company is in the first tier of the IT industry.

Article usage.

Our company is in the firhighest tier of the IT industry. Our company is in the highest tier of the IT industry.

"First" is okay, but when talking about tiers, it sounds more natural to talk about higher and lower tiers.

Our company is in the first tier of the IT industry. Our company is in the first tier of the IT industry.

One year ago, it was the first in the local life services region. One year ago, it was the first in the local life services region.

One year ago, it was the first inleader in the local life services region. One year ago, it was the leader in the local life services region.

Add a space after the comma. “Leader in the local life services sector” is more natural

One year ago, it was the first in local life services region. One year ago, it was the first in local life services region.

I'm not sure what "local life services region" means. Do you mean that it was "ranked first in the area of local life services"?

One year ago, it was the first in the local life services region. One year ago, it was the first in the local life services region.

One year ago, it was the first in the area of local life(?) services region. One year ago, it was the first in the area of local life(?) services.

"region" is very much tied to specific real places. "area" can be used more metaphorically to mean things like "the business we focus on", which I think is what you meant. I'm not fully sure what you mean by "local life services" however.

Up to one year ago, many internet giants have tried to competed with it, but no one defeated it. Up to one year ago, many internet giants tried to compete with it, but none defeated it.

Use “tried to compete” Also, “none” is smoother than "no one"

Up to onentil last year ago, many internet giants haved tried to competed with it, but no one defeated it. Until last year, many internet giants had tried to compete with it, but no one defeated it.

Up tountil one year ago, many internet giants have tried to competed with it, but no one defeated it. Up until one year ago, many internet giants tried to compete with it, but no one defeated it.

Up to one year ago, many internet giants have tried to competed with it, but no one defeated it. Up to one year ago, many internet giants have tried to compete with it, but no one defeated it.

"have tried to" already makes that clause past tense, but when you're describing what they were trying to do, that goes in the present tense. It's complicated, I know.

Most people had trusted that our company would constantly be the first in the next 5 or even more years. Most people had trusted that our company would constantly be the first in the next 5 or even more years.

Most people had trusted that our company would constantly be the first in the next 5 even more yearsyears, or even longer. Most people had trusted that our company would constantly be the first in the next 5 years, or even longer.

Most people had trusted that our company would constantly be the first, even in the next 5 even more years. Most people had trusted that our company would constantly be the first, even in the next 5 years.

Most people had trustbelieved that our company would constantly be the first in the next 5 years, or even more years. Most people had believed that our company would constantly be the first in the next 5 years, or even more.

However, since Q1, 2025, JingDong and Alibaba declared war with our company one after another. However, since Q1, 2025, JingDong and Alibaba declared war with our company one after another.

However, since Q1 2025, JingDong and Alibaba have declared war withon our company one after another. However, since Q1 2025, JingDong and Alibaba have declared war on our company one after another.

Add a comma after “Q1 2025.” Use “declared war on” instead of “with.” Present perfect (“have declared”) fits better with “since.”

However, since Q1, 2025 JingDong and Alibaba declared war with our company one after another. However, since Q1, 2025 JingDong and Alibaba declared war with our company one after another.

However, since Q1 2025 JingDong and Alibaba declared war withon our company one after another. However, since Q1 2025 JingDong and Alibaba declared war on our company one after another.

We were so busy to copecoping with the war. We were so busy coping with the war.

We were so busy to copecoping with the war. We were so busy coping with the war.

Use “coping with” instead of “to cope with.”

We were so busy to copecoping with the war. We were so busy coping with the war.

We were so busy to copecoping with the warcompetition. We were so busy coping with the competition.

"so busy to" doesn't quite make sense, it could be "too busy to cope" which means you didn't have time to do it, or "so busy coping" which just indicates that it made you very busy but doesn't imply whether you succeeded or failed.

At first, JingDong didn't capture much market share, but two months later, Alibaba started a much stronger attack and captured lots of market share. At first, JingDong didn't capture much market share, but two months later, Alibaba started a much stronger attack and captured lots of market share.

Up toBy August 2025, Alibaba and our were company nearly were neck and neck. By August 2025, Alibaba and our were company nearly neck and neck.

“By August” is more natural. Remove “nearly” before “were” for smoother phrasing.

Last week, Alibaba declared that they had the decision of grabbing the first in the local life services region. Last week, Alibaba declared that they had the decision of grabbing the first in the local life services region.

Last week, Alibaba declared that they had the decision of grabbing the first in local life services region. Last week, Alibaba declared that they had the decision of grabbing the first in local life services region.

Once again I'm not sure I understand what "grabbing the first in local life services region" means.

Last week, Alibaba declared that they had the decision of grabbing the first in the local life services region. Last week, Alibaba declared that they had the decision of grabbing the first in the local life services region.

Last week, Alibaba declared that they had the decision of grabbintend to grab first place ing the first inarea of local life services region. Last week, Alibaba declared that they intend to grab first place in the area of local life services.

"had the decision of grabbing" ends up sounding overly wordy and hence unnatural. "they intend to grab" / "they decided to grab" are shorter and more active, so sound more natural in English.