I want to live in a world where buildcreating things patiently and slowlywith heart is valued. I want to live in a world where creating things patiently and with heart is valued.

I think the answer might be in the affirmative."yes." I think the answer might be "yes."

I think the answer might be in the affirmative"yes". I think the answer might be "yes".

I work infor a media company, and our editors use AI tools to produce news images. I work for a media company, and our editors use AI tools to produce news images.

I work infor a media company, and our editors use AI tools to produce news images. I work for a media company, and our editors use AI tools to produce news images.

Have you used (any) AI tools before? Have you used (any) AI tools before?

Even if they are very high-top quality, still give me an itchynagging feeling. Even if they are top quality, still give me an nagging feeling.

I am an illustrator. AI breaks my heart. It is a good tool to HELP (like autocorrect when you're texting), but many people are using it to generate artwork without putting in any artistic effort.

Even if they are very high-quality, they still give me an itchy feeling of discomfort. Even if they are very high-quality, they still give me a feeling of discomfort.

Even if they are very high-quality, still give me an itchystrange feeling. Even if they are very high-quality, still give me an strange feeling.

"Strange" feels more natural here.

It reminds me of the new iPad Pro ad called 'Crush', which showed the creative tools being 'crushed' because the new iPad Pro could easily replace them. It reminds me of the new iPad Pro ad called 'Crush', which showed creative tools being 'crushed' because the new iPad Pro could easily replace them.

It reminds me of the new iPad Pro ad called 'Crush', which showed the creative tools being crushed because the new iPad Pro could easily replace them. It reminds me of the new iPad Pro ad called 'Crush', which showed creative tools being crushed because the new iPad Pro could easily replace them.

I do understand the concept of the ad, and it is indeed amazing that nowadaye things technology can do nowadays compared to decades ago, but still, the valueidea that things could be thrown away if it is less effective made me frustrated. I do understand the concept of the ad, and it is indeed amazing the things technology can do nowadays compared to decades ago, but still, the idea that things could be thrown away if it is less effective made me frustrated.

I do understand the concept of the ad, and it is indeed amazing twhat nowadays technology can do compared to decades ago, but still, the valuethe idea that things could simply be thrown away if it isthey are less effective made meis frustrateding. I do understand the concept of the ad, and it is indeed amazing what technology can do compared to decades ago, but the idea that things could simply be thrown away if they are less effective is frustrating.

I do understand the concept of the ad, and it is indeed amazing twhat nowadays technology nowadays can do compared to decades ago, but still, the valuethe idea that things cshould be thrown away if it isthey are less effective made me frustrated me. I do understand the concept of the ad, and it is indeed amazing what technology nowadays can do compared to decades ago, but the idea that things should be thrown away if they are less effective frustrated me.

I do understand the concept of the ad, and it is indeed amazing that nowadays technology can do compared to decades ago, but still, the value that things could be thrown away if it is less effective made me frustrated. I understand the concept of the ad, and it is indeed amazing that nowadays technology can do compared to decades ago, but still, the value that things could be thrown away if it is less effective made me frustrated.

it sounds more natural to use "I understand..." instead of "I do understand..."