May 1, 2024
There is an ongoing discussion around whether governments should spend money on programs encouraging the public to be active and healthy, instead of training a few athletes to win medals at the Olympics. While I partially agree that the general population no compete in high sports events, I also believe that it is still important to invest in High-performance athletes.
Firstly, training athletes for the Olympics incentives the general population to do more exercise. When a country is recognized for a sport, it becomes mainstream in the media and in public discussion. For instance, after Colombia started to be better known in cycling, my whole neighbor created a cycling club to gather people who wanted to do some exercise. However, the number of these athletes is usually very low compared with the general population, that is the reason I believe that governments should invest in programs aimed to the public.
Secondly, investing on high-perform athletes is beneficial to the public because it provides well-equipped infrastructure. For example, when governments decide to hold the Olympics games, they also put a lot of money on building to do a variety of sports, which can be used later by the public. When I visited Canada, I skated on ice in an ice rink that was built for the Winter Olympics game. The infrastructure was being used by the public to skate.
In conclusion, investing in talented athletes can encourage people to exercise more, and also the infrastructure investment for sport events can be used later by the public.
30/04 Another opinion essay :) Thank you
There is an ongoing discussion around whether governments should spend money on programs encouraging the public to be active and healthy, instead of training a few athletes to win medals at the Olympics.
While I partially agree that the general population do not compete in high sports events, I also believe that it is still important to invest in Hhigh-performance athletes.
While I partially agree that the general population do not compete in high sports events, I also believe that it is still important to invest in high-performance athletes.
Firstly, training athletes for the Olympics incentivencourages the general population to do more exercise.
Firstly, training athletes for the Olympics encourages the general population to do more exercise.
When a country is recognized for a sport, it becomes mainstream in the media and in public discussion.
For instance, after Colombia started to be better known in cycling, my whole neighborurhood created a cycling club to gather people who wanted to do some exercise.
For instance, after Colombia started to be better known in cycling, my whole neighbourhood created a cycling club to gather people who wanted to do some exercise.
The u in ‘neighbourhood’ is technically more British/Canadian. It isn’t as common in the USA
However, the number of these athletes is usually very low compared with the general population, that is the reason I believe that governments should invest in programs aimed to the public.
However, the number of these athletes is usually very low compared with the general population, so I believe that governments should invest in programs aimed to the public.
Secondly, investing oin high-performance athletes is beneficial to the public because it provides well-equipped infrastructure.
Secondly, investing in high-performance athletes is beneficial to the public because it provides well-equipped infrastructure.
For example, when governments decide to holdst the Olympics games, they also put a lot of money on building to do a variety of sports, which can be used later by the public.
For example, when governments decide to host the Olympic games, they also put a lot of money on building to do a variety of sports, which can be used later by the public.
When I visited Canada, I skated on ice in an ice rink that was built for the Winter Olympics games.
When I visited Canada, I skated on an ice rink that was built for the Winter Olympic games.
The infrastructure was being used by the public to skate.
In conclusion, investing in talented athletes can encourage people to exercise more, and also the infrastructure investment for sport events can be used later by the public.
Feedback
Well formulated argument, as well as mainly good English. Just a couple of things that needed fixing. Good luck as you continue learning!
30/04 Another opinion essay :) Thank you
There is an ongoing discussion aroundon whether governments should spend money on programs encouraging the general public to be active and healthy, instead of training a few athletes to win medals at the Olympics.
There is an ongoing discussion on whether governments should spend money on programs encouraging the general public to be active and healthy, instead of training a few athletes to win medals at the Olympics.
While I partially agree that the general population does not compete in highsuch high-profile sports events, I also believe that it is still important to invest in Hhigh-performance athletes.
While I partially agree that the general population does not compete in such high-profile sports events, I also believe it is still important to invest in high-performance athletes.
Firstly, training athletes for the Olympics incentivencourages the general population to do more exercise more.
Firstly, training athletes for the Olympics encourages the general population to exercise more.
When a country is recognized for a sport, it becomes mainstream in the media and in public discussion.
For instance, after Colombia started to be betterbecoming well known infor cycling, my wholentire neighborhood created a cycling club to gathefor people who wanted to do some exerciscycle.
For instance, after Colombia started becoming well known for cycling, my entire neighborhood created a cycling club for people who wanted to cycle.
However, the number of these athletes is usually very low compared withto the general population, that is the reasonwhich is why I believe that governments should invest in programs aimed ato the general public.
However, the number of these athletes is usually very low compared to the general population, which is why I believe that governments should invest in programs aimed at the general public.
Secondly, investing oin high-performance athletes is beneficial to the public because it providebuilds well-equipped infrastructurefacilities.
Secondly, investing in high-performance athletes is beneficial to the public because it builds well-equipped facilities.
For example, when governments decide to hold the Olympics games, they also putour a lot of money inton buildings to dohat host a variety of sports, which can be used later by the public.
For example, when governments decide to hold the Olympic games, they also pour a lot of money into buildings that host a variety of sports, which can be used later by the public.
When I visited Canada, I skated on ice in an ice rink that washad been built for the Winter Olympics game.
When I visited Canada, I skated in an ice rink that had been built for the Winter Olympics.
The infrastructure wasfacilities were being used by the public to skate.
The facilities were being used by the public to skate.
In conclusion, investing in talented athletes can encourage people to exercise more, and also the infrastructure investmentthe facilities used for sporting events can be used later by the public.
In conclusion, investing in talented athletes can encourage people to exercise more, and the facilities used for sporting events can be used later by the public.
30/04 Another opinion essay :) Thank you
There is an ongoing discussion around whether governments should spend money on programs encouraging the public to be active and healthy, instead of training a few athletes to win medals at the Olympics.
While I partially agree that the general population do not compete in high profile sports events, I also believe that it is still important to invest in Hhigh-performanceing athletes.
While I partially agree that the general population do not compete in high profile sports events, I also believe that it is important to invest in high-performing athletes.
Firstly, training athletes for the Olympics incentivencourages the general population to do more exercise.
Firstly, training athletes for the Olympics encourages the general population to do more exercise.
When a country is recognized for a sport, ithe issue/ the subject becomes mainstream in the media and in public discussion.
When a country is recognized for a sport, the issue/ the subject becomes mainstream in the media and in public discussion.
For instance, after Colombia started to be better known in cycling, my whole neighborurhood created a cycling club to gathersupport people who wanted to do some exercise.
For instance, after Colombia started to be better known in cycling, my neighbourhood created a cycling club to support people who wanted to do some exercise.
You could also say - to get together people who wanted to do more exercise.
However, the number of these athletes is usually very low compared with the general population, and so, that is the reason I believe that governments should invest in programs aimed ato the general public.
However, the number of these athletes is usually very low compared with the general population, and so, that is the reason I believe governments should invest in programs aimed at the general public.
Secondly, investing oin high-performing athletes is beneficial to the public because it provides well-equippea good infrastructure.
Secondly, investing in high-performing athletes is beneficial to the public because it provides a good infrastructure.
For example, when governments decide to hold the Olympics games, they also puinvest a lot of money oin building to doinfrastructure for a variety of sports, which ca. This can then be used later by the public.
For example, when governments decide to hold the Olympics games, they also invest a lot of money in building infrastructure for a variety of sports. This can then be used later by the public.
When I visited Canada, I skated on ice in an ice rink that was built for the Winter Olympics game.
When I visited Canada, I skated in an ice rink that was built for the Winter Olympics game.
The infrastructure was now being used by the public to skate.
The infrastructure was now being used by the public.
In conclusion, investing in talented athletes can encourage people to exercise more, and also the investment in infrastructure investment for sporting events can later be used later by the public.
In conclusion, investing in talented athletes can encourage people to exercise more, and also the investment in infrastructure for sporting events can later be used by the public.
There is an ongoing discussion around whether governments should spend money on programs encouraging the public to be active and healthy, instead of training a few athletes to win medals at the Olympics.
While I partially agree that the general population does not compete in high sports events, I also believe that it is still important to invest in Hhigh-performanceing athletes.
While I partially agree that the general population does not compete in high sports events, I also believe that it is still important to invest in high-performing athletes.
Firstly, training athletes for the Olympics incentivizes the general population to do more exercise more.
Firstly, training athletes for the Olympics incentivizes the general population to exercise more.
When a country is recognized for a sport, it becomes mainstream in the media and in public discussion.
For instance, after Colombia started to be better known in cycling, my wholesome of my neighbors created a cycling club to gather people who wanted to do some exercise.
For instance, after Colombia started to be better known in cycling, some of my neighbors created a cycling club to gather people who wanted to do some exercise.
could also be "my neighborhood" depending on the intended meaning
However, the number of these athletes is usually very low compared with the general population, that is the reason I believe that governments should invest in programs aimed ato the public.
However, the number of these athletes is usually very low compared with the general population, that is the reason I believe that governments should invest in programs aimed at the public.
Secondly, investing oin high-performing athletes is beneficial to the public because it provides well-equipped infrastructure.
Secondly, investing in high-performing athletes is beneficial to the public because it provides well-equipped infrastructure.
For example, when governments decide to hold the Olympics games, they also put a lot of money on building to do a variety of sports, which can be used later by the public.
When I visited Canada, I skated on ice in an ice rink that was built for the Winter Olympics game.
When I visited Canada, I skated on ice in an ice rink that was built for the Winter Olympics.
The infrastructure was being used by the public to skate.
In conclusion, investing in talented athletes can encourage people to exercise more, and also the infrastructure investment for sports events can be used later by the public.
In conclusion, investing in talented athletes can encourage people to exercise more, and infrastructure investment for sports events can be used later by the public.
Feedback
Nice essay! Sports events definitely have their place! :)
|
30/04 Another opinion essay :) Thank you This sentence has been marked as perfect! This sentence has been marked as perfect! This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
There is an ongoing discussion around whether governments should spend money on programs encouraging the public to be active and healthy, instead of training a few athletes to win medals at the Olympics. This sentence has been marked as perfect! This sentence has been marked as perfect!
There is an ongoing discussion This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
While I partially agree that the general population no compete in high sports events, I also believe that it is still important to invest in High-performance athletes.
While I partially agree that the general population does not compete in high sports events, I also believe that it is still important to invest in
While I partially agree that the general population do not compete in high profile sports events, I also believe that it is
While I partially agree that the general population does not compete in
While I partially agree that the general population do not compete in high sports events, I also believe that it is still important to invest in |
|
Firstly, training athletes for the Olympics incentives the general population to do more exercise.
Firstly, training athletes for the Olympics incentivizes the general population to
Firstly, training athletes for the Olympics
Firstly, training athletes for the Olympics
Firstly, training athletes for the Olympics |
|
When a country is recognized for a sport, it becomes mainstream in the media and in public discussion. This sentence has been marked as perfect!
When a country is recognized for a sport, This sentence has been marked as perfect! This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
For instance, after Colombia started to be better known in cycling, my whole neighbor created a cycling club to gather people who wanted to do some exercise.
For instance, after Colombia started to be better known in cycling, could also be "my neighborhood" depending on the intended meaning
For instance, after Colombia started to be better known in cycling, my You could also say - to get together people who wanted to do more exercise.
For instance, after Colombia started
For instance, after Colombia started to be better known in cycling, my whole neighbo The u in ‘neighbourhood’ is technically more British/Canadian. It isn’t as common in the USA |
|
However, the number of these athletes is usually very low compared with the general population, that is the reason I believe that governments should invest in programs aimed to the public.
However, the number of these athletes is usually very low compared with the general population, that is the reason I believe that governments should invest in programs aimed at
However, the number of these athletes is usually very low compared with the general population, and so, that is the reason I believe
However, the number of these athletes is usually very low compared
However, the number of these athletes is usually very low compared with the general population, |
|
Secondly, investing on high-perform athletes is beneficial to the public because it provides well-equipped infrastructure.
Secondly, investing
Secondly, investing
Secondly, investing
Secondly, investing |
|
When I visited Canada, I skated on ice in an ice rink that was built for the Winter Olympics game.
When I visited Canada, I skated on ice in an ice rink that was built for the Winter Olympics
When I visited Canada, I skated
When I visited Canada, I skated
When I visited Canada, I skated on |
|
For example, when governments decide to hold the Olympics games, they also put a lot of money on building to do a variety of sports, which can be used later by the public. This sentence has been marked as perfect!
For example, when governments decide to hold the Olympics games, they also
For example, when governments decide to hold the Olympic
For example, when governments decide to ho |
|
The infrastructure was being used by the public to skate. This sentence has been marked as perfect!
The infrastructure was now being used by the public
The This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
In conclusion, investing in talented athletes can encourage people to exercise more, and also the infrastructure investment for sport events can be used later by the public.
In conclusion, investing in talented athletes can encourage people to exercise more, and
In conclusion, investing in talented athletes can encourage people to exercise more, and also the investment in infrastructure
In conclusion, investing in talented athletes can encourage people to exercise more, and This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
You need LangCorrect Premium to access this feature.
Go Premium