Some people think that education in China is exam-oriented education and itand has many disadvantages, especially for people who are not good at taking exams, but theyyet have a strong practical ability or creative ability, but they can't give are is no set of selection systems that areis better than the 高考. Some people think that education in China is exam-oriented and has many disadvantages, especially for people who are not good at taking exams, yet have a strong practical or creative ability, but there is no set of selection systems that is better than the 高考.

The "education" was repeated and unnecessary, and the "it" in "it has" was also implied. Including the "they" in "but they have a strong practical..." gives the sentence the wrong meaning. I only changed the "but" to "yet" because the "but" is repeated afterwards - it would've been fine otherwise. The last sentence also technically makes sense, but "give" sounds a bit weird here and "they" is a little ambiguous. I also think "高考" should be written out in pinyin (as gaokao) or with it's full name translated (National College Entrance Examination) if writing for an English audience. This is only a journal though, so it doesn't matter too much.

Although 高考in really hasity, the 高考 does have certain disadvantages, in contrast, it seems that it is still a fair system for selecting talentsed people at present, so we have been using it all the timecontinued to use it. Although in reality, the 高考 does have certain disadvantages, it seems that it is still a fair system for selecting talented people at present, so we have continued to use it.

I feel "in reality" expresses the meaning better than "really", "in contrast" isn't needed since you used "although" already, and "all the time" is a little confusing - the 高考 only happens once a year, so it doesn't really happen "all the time".

They were like:For example, they say that although Chinese students could get the bestget good scores in many exams, they wouldn't do invention and creation in their life, not like some West Country studentsgrow up to invent or create, unlike some students in the west, especially in the US. For example, they say that although Chinese students get good scores in many exams, they won't grow up to invent or create, unlike some students in the west, especially in the US.

I don't know if I understood it correctly, but "do" isn't the right verb for "invention" or "creation". "In their life" sounds awkward, and "west country" isn't normally capitalized or used as an adjective. Also, I think "they were like" is too informal for what you're looking for.

They may not have a good scores in their examinations, but they are able to make great achievements in their rest of their life and the number of Nobel Prize winners they have can support this. They may not have good scores in their examinations, but they are able to make great achievements in the rest of their life and the number of Nobel Prize winners they have can support this.