Thanks very much for sharing your opinions & suggestions, xq. This is really helpful to me.

I also find it frustrating that we can’t see others’ corrections while we are correcting. To get around this, I often open two browser windows, one to read others’ corrections, and another to enter my own corrections. This is tedious, though. I brought up a related topic in the community forum and the developer expressed some willingness to address this issue: https://community.langcorrect.com/t/collaborative-correcting/

One feature that I really like about LangCorrect is the ability to edit our corrections after we’ve submitted them. This is useful to me since I often make mistakes in my corrections and like to go back and fix them. :-)

1. 我觉得“这会是”跟“这将会是”没有什么区别，无非是第二个更具体一点而已。
2. 突然看到有人将“后遗症”改为“副作用”，我也觉得这个更贴合打疫苗这件事，因为后遗症从字面上来理解，顾名思义就是疾病在康复之后，遗留下来的某些症状。临床上药物的副作用是指在使用某种药物时，按照正常的剂量和频次，患者出现与治疗效果相反或无关的反应。

抱歉，昨晚修改时没有想到。

Last night, I just tried to keep all the other corrections in mind and then correct. Next time, I will try you method. It’s better. Thanks for sharing this. I hope this problem will be solved soon. I noticed this special function, too. It’s great.

Also, Say “周三、四” or “周三、周四” is totally correct, the first one sounds informal, and the second one is formal.

I thought so! Thanks. 😁

By the way, there’s an important difference between Lang-8 and LangCorrect that I learned “the hard way”: in Lang-8, in your own post, if you edit a sentence AFTER you have received corrections for that sentence, you will still be able to see the “old” corrections, but in LangCorrect, those old corrections will disappear! Therefore, if you want to save an old correction, before you edit the sentence you need to “reply” to the correction. Replying will copy the correction into the comments section so you’ll be able to see it even after you’ve edited the original sentence.

You know, what really moved me of this website is that it seems like English entries are very likely to be corrected by native English speakers. It definitely motivates English learners to continue to update here. However, in Lang-8, it’s sad to see many English posts that nobody corrects. During these past few years, I have been always looking forward to the day when Lang-8 accepted the registration of new members. I hope both or either website will be active, because for those who really wants to master English, they really need such a correcting website. Every time I log in Lang-8 and see you are still active, I’m so happy for English learners. Your corrections really motivates them to learn English well.

Yes, I’ve also noticed that English posts tend to get a lot more corrections here than in Lang-8. I assume that this is because the ratio of native English speakers to English learners is much higher here, which is probably due to the fact that LangCorrect is based in the West (maybe in the US), whereas Lang-8 is Japanese, and both systems tend to draw users from their local areas.

One thing I’ve noticed about the English corrections, though, is that the corrections I see right now on LangCorrect often contain a lot of errors—the native English speakers making these corrections probably aren’t very good English writers—but on Lang-8 right now, most of the corrections are quite good. I’m not sure why, but I know that Lang-8 has managed to retain about half a dozen English correctors who are very dedicated and conscientious, and they correct so many posts that (I think) they tend to raise the general standard of correction there.

By the way, the Lang-8 administrators recently announced on the Lang-8 blog that they don’t plan to open up Lang-8 to new users. :-(
https://blog.lang-8.com/post/704678634227695616/regarding-lang-8-signups

I couldn’t open the link, but I’m sad to hear this news. Hopefully, LangCorrect will be a good substitution.

With curiosity, I read some Chinese corrections, their qualities are similar to Lang-8’s. Thanks for telling me that many English corrections have errors, if not, I will assume that are fine. It’s really hard to distinguish from right to wrong. Hope the quality will get better.

好的，谢谢你！

我不认同这个改法，直接将作者原文的意思给改了
作者英文原文用的是将来时，中文中【这会是】是能表达将来要做的意思的
虽然【这会是】听起来确实有点点奇怪，但改成【这是】就直接吧时态改成了过去式或者现在时

我的建议是改成【这将是】或者【这将会是】
@JoeTofu

Hi joetofu
看看这篇批改下我的留言
希望对你有帮助

谢谢你，kent

不客气 JoeTofu
忘记说了
英文部分的中文修改，是我认为更自然地说法

字面上来说，前后保持时态一致，加上“将”能让人更容易理解时态的变化，不会引起歧义
但我仔细一想，平时确实会这么说：“我明天要去打针，这是我的第五针疫苗”
所以，我认为两种都可以

👍

谢谢你，Alcina！

我不认同这个改法，直接将作者原文的意思给改了
作者英文原文用的是将来时，中文中【这会是】是能表达将来要做的意思的
虽然【这会是】听起来确实有点点奇怪，但改成【这是】就直接吧时态改成了过去式或者现在时

我的建议是改成【这将是】或者【这将会是】
@JoeTofu

Hi joetofu
看看这篇批改下我的留言
希望对你有帮助

@kent 谢谢你，“这将是” 或 “这将会是” 听起来更顺耳。

@alcina 我个人认为 “这是” 也可以，因为前一句已经提到了 “下周”，把整段的时太定为未来时，所以这句不需要特别强调是 “未来时”。

@kent 谢谢你，“这将是” 或 “这将会是” 听起来比 “这会是” 更顺耳。但是我个人还是有一点怀疑， “这是” 是不是最自然，因为前一句的 “下周” 这两个字是不是已经把整段的时太定为 “未来时”，所以从内文我门已经知道第二、第三句也是未来时的，没必要特别加个 “将” 或 “将会”？我不知道我说到有没有道理……

字面上来说，前后保持时态一致，加上“将”能让人更容易理解时态的变化，不会引起歧义
但我仔细一想，平时确实会这么说：“我明天要去打针，这是我的第五针疫苗”
所以，我认为两种都可以

我明白了，谢谢你

“后遗症”应该改为“副作用”

谢谢你，ce. Nice to see you over here on LangCorrect, too. 😁

1. 我觉得“这会是”跟“这将会是”没有什么区别，无非是第二个更具体一点而已。
2. 突然看到有人将“后遗症”改为“副作用”，我也觉得这个更贴合打疫苗这件事，因为后遗症从字面上来理解，顾名思义就是疾病在康复之后，遗留下来的某些症状。临床上药物的副作用是指在使用某种药物时，按照正常的剂量和频次，患者出现与治疗效果相反或无关的反应。

抱歉，昨晚修改时没有想到。

谢谢你！

是错别字！谢谢你😁

谢谢你帮我修改！

> 我被封控在家真的很难受
你好可怜！我无法想象被封控在家是什么样的感觉……

我又打错别字了🙄

哈哈😂
我也经常打错别字