tommy's avatar
tommy

Sept. 20, 2021

0
Economic Sanctions

Topic: Are economic sanctions a useful foreign-policy tool?
It is critically important to have foreign policy tools other than military options. In my opinion, economic sanctions are most powerful diplomatic tools today. I feel this way for three reasons, which I’ll explore in the following essay.
To begin with, economic sanctions can prevent dictators or military regimes from earning their funding. They are likely to exploit citizen's properties such as real estate or food forcefully. However, severe inflation caused by economic sanctions lessens the value of their funding. In addition, they wouldn’t pull off sufficient amount of money if they have bank accounts in foreign countries.
Second, shortage of funding would make it harder to possess weapons preparing for dispute with hostile countries. As you know, making powerful rockets or maintaining mighty armies costs an enormous amount of money. Since military power is essential for anti-democratic countries, international community should make great efforts to get rid of their weapons by peaceful means.
Finally, the degree of economic sanctions can be easily controlled depending on the target countries’ attitude. If the countries keep threatening their citizens or neighboring countries, other countries should get together to impose stronger sanctions. On the other hand, sanctions can be immediately eased as a result of the negotiation.
I’m convinced that economic sanctions are useful as a foreign-policy tool because those measures can effectively lessen budgets of military regimes and prevent them from making weapons. In addition, those policies can be easily suspended.

Corrections

Economic Sanctions

Topic: Are economic sanctions a useful foreign-policy tool?

It is critically important to have foreign policy tools other than military options.

In my opinion, economic sanctions are most powerful diplomatic tools today.

In my opinion, economic sanctions are the most powerful diplomatic tools today.

To begin with, economic sanctions can prevent dictators or military regimes from earning their funding.

To begin with, economic sanctions can prevent dictators or military regimes from gaining funding.

They are likely to exploit citizen's properties such as real estate or food forcefully.

They are likely to seize the property of their citizens, such as real estate or food.

However, severe inflation caused by economic sanctions lessens the value of their funding.

In addition, they wouldn’t pull off sufficient amount of money if they have bank accounts in foreign countries.

In addition, they wouldn’t be able to withdraw a sufficient amount of money if they have bank accounts in foreign countries.

Second, shortage of funding would make it harder to possess weapons preparing for dispute with hostile countries.

Second, a shortage of funding would make it harder to purchase weapons when preparing for disputes with hostile countries.

As you know, making powerful rockets or maintaining mighty armies costs an enormous amount of money.

Since military power is essential for anti-democratic countries, international community should make great efforts to get rid of their weapons by peaceful means.

Since military power is essential for anti-democratic countries, the international community should make great efforts to get rid of their weapons by peaceful means.

Finally, the degree of economic sanctions can be easily controlled depending on the target countries’ attitude.

On the other hand, sanctions can be immediately eased as a result of the negotiation.

On the other hand, sanctions can be immediately eased as a result of negotiation.

"The" would mean a specific negotiation. Leaving it out is more general.

I’m convinced that economic sanctions are useful as a foreign-policy tool because those measures can effectively lessen budgets of military regimes and prevent them from making weapons.

I’m convinced that economic sanctions are useful as a foreign-policy tool because those measures can effectively lessen the budgets of military regimes and prevent them from making weapons.

In addition, those policies can be easily suspended.

In addition, those policies can be easily suspended as necessary.

Feedback

Wonderful work with minor errors that do not impact my ability to understand your essay. Well done! Please review the use of the definite article.

tommy's avatar
tommy

Sept. 20, 2021

0

Thank you for your warm comment on my post! I'll check your corrections in detail.

Economic Sanctions

Topic: Are economic sanctions a useful foreign-policy tool?

It is critically important to have foreign policy tools other than military options.

In my opinion, economic sanctions are most powerful diplomatic tools today.

In my opinion, economic sanctions are most powerful diplomatic tools today.

I feel this way for three reasons, which I’ll explore in the following essay.

To begin with, economic sanctions can prevent dictators or military regimes from earning their funding.

To begin with, economic sanctions can prevent dictators or military regimes from earning their funding.

They are likely to exploit citizen's properties such as real estate or food forcefully.

They are likely to exploit citizen's properties such as real estate or food forcefully.

However, severe inflation caused by economic sanctions lessens the value of their funding.

In addition, they wouldn’t pull off sufficient amount of money if they have bank accounts in foreign countries.

In addition, they wouldn’t pull off sufficient amount of money if they have bank accounts in foreign countries.

Second, shortage of funding would make it harder to possess weapons preparing for dispute with hostile countries.

Second, shortage of funding would make it harder to possess weapons preparing for dispute with hostile countries.

As you know, making powerful rockets or maintaining mighty armies costs an enormous amount of money.

Since military power is essential for anti-democratic countries, international community should make great efforts to get rid of their weapons by peaceful means.

Since military power is essential for anti-democratic countries, international community should make great efforts to get rid of their weapons by peaceful means.

Finally, the degree of economic sanctions can be easily controlled depending on the target countries’ attitude.

If the countries keep threatening their citizens or neighboring countries, other countries should get together to impose stronger sanctions.

On the other hand, sanctions can be immediately eased as a result of the negotiation.

On the other hand, sanctions can be immediately eased as a result of the negotiation.

I’m convinced that economic sanctions are useful as a foreign-policy tool because those measures can effectively lessen budgets of military regimes and prevent them from making weapons.

I’m convinced that economic sanctions are useful as a foreign-policy tool because those measures can effectively lessen budgets of military regimes and prevent them from making weapons.

In addition, those policies can be easily suspended.

In addition, those policies can be easily suspended.

You need LangCorrect Premium to access this feature.

Go Premium