andrea's avatar
andrea

July 30, 2021

0
Are there professions that the society allows be amoral?.

When we were raised by our parents, professors, church, among others. They taught us about morality, ethics, what is good or bad, but when we get close to the way the world worked, we figured out that these values do not work in some areas of the society.


You can see a flexible morality in lawyers. They choose a part or position and build their cases, they do not always taking the fair side. They build the case that seem under the law, but that does not mean to be below the values taught us at home, like, the person that has to compensate a thief for defending itself, the country has to compensate a corrupt corporation for breaking some capsule of a contract, no matter the corruption context . All society knows about this behave and keep it no matter what .

How about the business world, some businessmen and companies have a profile that looks like that of a psychopath or a sociopath. They take advantage over other, non matter rights or lives of others. They finance corruption, pay for wars, manipulated people, they just care themselves. Again, all society knows about this behave and keep it no matter what.


The society embraces this kind of behaving, even exalts it. Why?. Maybe some kind of primitive instinct of predator and prey, where the winner deserves the award. I do not know. What do you think about it?.

Corrections

Are there professions that the society allows bthat are amoral?.

When we were raised by our parents, professors, and churches, among others.,

Connect with following sentence

They taught us about morality, ethics, what is good or bad, b. But when we get close tosaw the way the world worked, we figured out that these values do not work in some areas of theapply to every aspect of society.

You can see a flexible morality in lawyers.

Technically correct but awkward, would prefer "Lawyers exhibit/demonstrate flexible morality

They choose a part or position and build their cases, they do not always takinge the fairright side.

They build the case that seem under the law, but that does not mean to be below the values taught us at homecases that are fine in court, like, theat a person that has tomust compensate a thief for defending ithemself, or that the country has to compensate a corrupt corporation for breaking some capsulepart of a contract, no matter the corruption context . But that does not mean that they follow the values taught to us at home.

All sSociety knows about this behaveior and keepstill allows it no matter what .

How aboutIn the business world, some businessmen and companies have a profile that looks like that of a psychopath or a sociopath.

They take advantage overf others, non matterwhose rights orand lives of odon't matter to thersm.

They finance corruption, pay for wars, manipulated people,; they just care for themselves.

Again, all society knows about this behave and keep it no matter what.

See above correction

The sSociety embraces this kind of behaving,or, and even exalts it.

Why?.

Maybe some kind of primitive instinct of predator and prey, where the winner deserves the areward.

What do you think about it?.?

Feedback

Nice stuff! Interesting questions posed.

andrea's avatar
andrea

July 31, 2021

0

Thank you.

Are there professions that the society allows be amoral?.

Are there professions that the society allows bthat are amoral?.

When we were raised by our parents, professors, church, among others.

When we were raised by our parents, professors, and churches, among others.,

They taught us about morality, ethics, what is good or bad, but when we get close to the way the world worked, we figured out that these values do not work in some areas of the society.

They taught us about morality, ethics, what is good or bad, b. But when we get close tosaw the way the world worked, we figured out that these values do not work in some areas of theapply to every aspect of society.

You can see a flexible morality in lawyers.

You can see a flexible morality in lawyers.

They choose a part or position and build their cases, they do not always taking the fair side.

They choose a part or position and build their cases, they do not always takinge the fairright side.

They build the case that seem under the law, but that does not mean to be below the values taught us at home, like, the person that has to compensate a thief for defending itself, the country has to compensate a corrupt corporation for breaking some capsule of a contract, no matter the corruption context .

They build the case that seem under the law, but that does not mean to be below the values taught us at homecases that are fine in court, like, theat a person that has tomust compensate a thief for defending ithemself, or that the country has to compensate a corrupt corporation for breaking some capsulepart of a contract, no matter the corruption context . But that does not mean that they follow the values taught to us at home.

All society knows about this behave and keep it no matter what .

All sSociety knows about this behaveior and keepstill allows it no matter what .

How about the business world, some businessmen and companies have a profile that looks like that of a psychopath or a sociopath.

How aboutIn the business world, some businessmen and companies have a profile that looks like that of a psychopath or a sociopath.

They take advantage over other, non matter rights or lives of others.

They take advantage overf others, non matterwhose rights orand lives of odon't matter to thersm.

They finance corruption, pay for wars, manipulated people, they just care themselves.

They finance corruption, pay for wars, manipulated people,; they just care for themselves.

Again, all society knows about this behave and keep it no matter what.

Again, all society knows about this behave and keep it no matter what.

The society embraces this kind of behaving, even exalts it.

The sSociety embraces this kind of behaving,or, and even exalts it.

Why?.

Why?.

Maybe some kind of primitive instinct of predator and prey, where the winner deserves the award.

Maybe some kind of primitive instinct of predator and prey, where the winner deserves the areward.

I do not know.

What do you think about it?.

What do you think about it?.?

You need LangCorrect Premium to access this feature.

Go Premium